Abstract:Objective To study the effect of two surgical procedures in the treatment with calculus of bile duct.Methods A total of 56 patients with calculus of bile duct greater than 1.0 cm treated in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 were selected as subjects.They were divided into control group(28 cases)and observation group(28 cases)according to the double-blind randomization principle.The control group was treated with endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP)for stone removal in the Department of Gastroenterology.The observation group was treated with laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopy in the Department of General Surgery.The clinical effects,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative blood amylase,postoperative bleeding and incidence of pancreatitis,postoperative residual stones,postoperative pain,eating time,hospital stay,total incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results The total clinical effective rate of patients in the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).The operation time of patients in the observation group was longer than that of the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group,the postoperative blood amylase was lower than the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores,eating time and hospitalization time between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic combined with choledochoscopy for the treatment of patients with calculus of bile duct greater than 1.0 cm is superior to ERCP,which can be used as the first choice for clinical treatment.
高绿林. 两种术式治疗胆管结石患者的效果比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(8): 52-54.
GAO Lü-lin. Effect comparison of two surgical procedures in the treatment of calculus of bile duct. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(8): 52-54.