家庭陪伴围生期护理在合并抑郁倾向产妇中的应用效果

摘要
图/表
参考文献(15)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (36 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的观察家庭陪伴围生期护理在合并抑郁倾向产妇中的应用效果。方法选取2017年1月～2018年12月我院收治的106 例产妇作为研究对象，按照入院时间将2017年收治的53 例产妇纳入常规组，2018年收治的53例产妇纳入家庭组。常规组采用常规围生期护理，家庭组采用家庭陪伴围生期护理，比较两组母婴结局、分娩并发症发生情况，分娩后5 d 评估两组的精神状态，随访1 个月评估两组产后抑郁症、精神病性症状发生率。结果家庭组自然分娩率为83.02%、新生儿异常率为5.66%、难产率为15.09%、总产程时间为（5.23±1.21）h，常规组依次为64.15%、22.64%、32.08%、（8.46±1.35）h，家庭组自然分娩率高于常规组，新生儿异常率、难产率低于常规组，家庭组总产程时间短于常规组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。家庭组产后无泌乳、便秘、创口感染发生率低于常规组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；分娩后5 d，家庭组汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、阴性与阳性症状量表（PANSS）评分低于常规组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。随访1 个月，家庭组产后抑郁症（PPD）发生率为9.43%、伴精神病性症状发生为1.89%，低于常规组的24.53%、13.21%，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论家庭陪伴围生期护理可有效改善合并抑郁倾向产妇的精神状态，降低母婴不良结局发生风险，能在一定程度上预防产妇发生产后抑郁症。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨薇

关键词 ：围生期护理, 产后抑郁症, 家庭陪护, 母婴结局

Abstract：Objective To observe the effect of family companion perinatal nursing in women with depression.Methods A total of 106 women with depressive propensity who were admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were selected.According to the admission time, 53 women who were admitted in 2017 were included in the routine group, and 53 women who were admitted in 2018 were included in the family group.The routine group used routine perinatal nursing, and the family group used family companion perinatal nursing.The maternal and child outcomes and the complications of childbirth were compared between the two groups.The mental state of the two groups was evaluated 5 days after delivery.The follow-up period was 1 month.The incidence of postpartum depression and psychotic symptoms in the two groups was evaluated.Results The natural delivery rate of the family group was 83.02%, the neonatal abnormal rate was 5.66%, the difficult labor rate was 15.09%, the total labor time was (5.23±1.21) h, and the routine group was 64.15%, 22.64%, 32.08%, (8.46±1.35) h, the natural delivery rate of the family group was higher than that of the routine group, the abnormal rate of the newborn, and the dystocia were lower than those of the routine group.The total maternal duration of the family group was shorter than that of the routine group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The incidence of lactation, constipation and wound infection were lower than the routine group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).On the 5th days after delivery, the family group maternal Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), negative and the positive symptom scale(PANSS) scores were lower than the routine group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The follow-up period of 1 month，the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD) in the family group was 9.43%, accompanied by psychotic symptoms for 1.89%, were lower than that of the routine group for 24.53% and 13.21%, respectively, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Family companion perinatal nursing can effectively improve the mental state of women with depression tendency, reduce the risk of maternal and child adverse outcomes, and prevent maternal postpartum depression to certain extent.

Key words： Perinatal nursing Postpartum depression;Family escort Maternal and child outcomes

作者简介: 杨薇（1977-），女，汉族，湖北荆州人，本科，主管护师，研究方向：妇产科护理

引用本文:

杨薇. 家庭陪伴围生期护理在合并抑郁倾向产妇中的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(13): 239-242.
YANG Wei. Application effect of family companion perinatal nursing in women with depression tendency. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(13): 239-242.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2020/V27/I13/239

[1]	Fisher SD，Wisner KL，Clark CT，et al.Factors associated with onset timing，symptoms，and severity of depression identified in thepostpartum period[J].J Affect Disord，2016，203：111-120.
[2]	Pawluski JL，Lonstein JS，Fleming AS.The neurobiology postpartumanxiety and depression[J].Trends Neurosci，2017，40（2）：106-120.
[3]	Netsi E，Pearson RM，Murray L，et al.Association of persistentand severe postnatal depression with child outcomes[J].JAMA Psychiatry，2018，75（3）：247-253.
[4]	邹青.国外产后访视工作的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志，2017，52（2）：253-256.
[5]	周海燕，蒋红梅.针对性护理干预对产后抑郁症的影响[J].重庆医学，2016，45（35）：5030-5032.
[6]	黄瑞瑞，雷倍美，付冰，等.围产期抑郁评估的研究进展[J].中国护理管理，2019，19（7）：1105-1109.
[7]	张明园.精神科评定量表手册[M].2 版.长沙：湖南科学技术出版社，1998：122-127.
[8]	何燕玲，张明园.阳性和阴性综合征量表（PANSS）及其应用[J].临床精神医学杂志，1997，7（6）：353-355.
[9]	夏兰.围术期优质护理干预在剖宫产产后抑郁防治中的应用[J]中国当代医药，2017，24（30）：189-191.
[10]	蒋丽，王丽.优质护理措施在预防产褥期产妇产后不良情绪的临床观察[J].河北医学，2015，21（5）：843-846.
[11]	侯纪湘，朱晓芳.自主神经功能检查及焦虑抑郁量表评分在不同妊娠阶段对产后抑郁症患者筛查价值的研究[J].解放军护理杂志，2018，35（15）：6-10.
[12]	栾丹丹，于秀荣，刘永云.新生儿重症监护病房住院早产儿母亲产后抑郁与早期泌乳量的相关性[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2018，32（8）：625-629.
[13]	章宝丹，许亮文，翁嘉，等.领悟社会支持对初产妇产后抑郁症的影响研究[J].中国预防医学杂志，2018，19（4）：241-245.
[14]	席卫娟.延续性护理对初产妇产褥期负性情绪和生活质量的影响[J].护理研究，2018，32（10）：1621-1624.
[15]	李翠丽，郎小娥，宋苗，等.护理模式、炎性因子和TSH 水平对产后抑郁障碍病人病情严重程度的影响[J].护理研究，2018，32（16）：2630-2633.