Abstract:Objective To study the effect of microscopic hematoma removal and conventional craniotomy for the treatment of hypertension basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage.Methods A total of 40 patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage who were treated in our hospital between January 1,2016 and December 31,2017 were selected as subjects.The patients were divided into 2 groups by odd-even grouping.Each group consisted of 20 patients.The patients in the control group received routine craniotomy.The patients in the experimental group underwent microsurgical hematoma removal.The surgical indexes,the incidence of complications,and the ability of daily living after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The average surgical time and postoperative hospital stay in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group,the intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group was less than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of the disease was 10.00%(2/20),which was lower than the incidence of the control group(40.00%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The daily living ability of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage by microscopic hematoma removal has less trauma to the patient and can reduce the risk of complications.It is worthy of popularization and application.