Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical effect of different radiotherapy doses on suspicious positive lymph nodes less than 1 cm in pelvic or para-aorta of advanced cervical cancer. Methods A total of 130 patients with advanced cervical cancer who were admitted to Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 with imaging showing that the maximum short diameter of pelvic and para-aorta lymph nodes were all less than 1 cm were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into Group A (65 cases) and Group B (65 cases) by random number table method. The prescribed dose of 55 Gy/25 f was given to the suspicious positive lymph nodes less than 1 cm, and the dose of 60 Gy/25 f was given to the suspicious positive lymph nodes less than 1 cm. Clinical effects, incidence of short-term and long-term adverse reactions and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results Total efficiency comparison between the two groups at the completion of radiotherapy and 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy, with no statistically significant difference (P＞0.05). The incidence of recent radioactive adverse reactions (grade I to Ⅱ radioactive enteritis, grade I to Ⅱ radiocystitis and grade I to Ⅱ myelosuppression) in the group B were higher than those in the group A, with statistically significant differences (P＜0.05). The incidence of long-term radioactive adverse reactions (grade I to Ⅱlate radioactive enteritis) in the group B was higher than that in the group A, with statistically significant difference (P＜0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced cervical cancer, 55 Gy can well control the suspected positive lymph nodes of pelvic lymph nodes less than 1 cm, with less adverse reactions, and can better improve the quality of life of patients, which may be worthy of clinical reference and promotion.
章玲玲；刘雅雯；涂海燕；李凌. 不同放疗剂量对晚期宫颈癌盆腹腔<1 cm的可疑阳性淋巴结的临床效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(35): 87-90.
ZHANG Ling-ling LIU Ya-wen TU Hai-yan LI Ling▲. Clinical effect of different radiotherapy doses on suspicious positive lymph nodes less than 1 cm in pelvic or para-aorta of advanced cervical cancer. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(35): 87-90.
Fernandez-Ots A，Crook J.The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy：Present and future[J].Rep Pract Oncol Radiother，2013，18（6）：363-370.
Pecorelli S，Zigliani L，Odicino F.Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2009，105（2）：107-108.
[4]
Chung HH，Cheon GJ，Kang KW，et al.Preoperative PET/CT FDG standardized uptake value of pelvic lymph nodes as a significant prognostic factor in patients with uterine cervical cancer[J].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging，2014，41（4）：674-681.
[5]
Scheidler J，Hricak H，Yu KK，et al.Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer.A meta-analysis[J].JAMA，1997，278：1096-1101.
Goodman KA，Regine WF，Dawson LA，et al.Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel guidelines for the delineation of the clinical target volume in the postoperative treatment of pancreatic head cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys，2012，83（3）：901-908.
Schwartz LH，Bogaerts J，Ford R，et al.Eisenhauer EA. E-valuation of lymph nodes with RECIST 1.1[J].Eur J Cancer，2009，45（2）：261-267.
[9]
Cox JD，Stetz J，Pajak TF.Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group（RTOG）and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer （EORTC）[J].Int J Radiat Oneol Biol Phys，1995，31（5）：1341-1346.
[11]
Reig A，Membrive I，Foro P，et al.Long-term results and prognostic factors of patients with cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J].Clin Transl Oncol，2011，13（7）：504-508.
[12]
Oglno I，Okamoto N，A ndoh K，et al.Analysis of prognostic factors in stage ⅡB -Ⅳ A cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy：value of computed tomography[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys，1997，37（5）：1071-1077.
[13]
Bipat S，Glas AS，van der Velden J，et al.Computed tomography andt magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical Carcinoma：a systematic review[J].Gynecol O ncol，2003，91（1）：59-66.
[16]
Song S，Kim JY，Kim YJ，et al.The size of the metastatic lymph node is an independent prognostic factor for the patients with cervical cancer treated by definitive radiotheraphy[J].Radiother Oncol，2013，108（1）：168-173.
[17]
Koh WJ，Abu-Rustum NR，Bean S，et al.Cervical Cancer，Version 3.2019，NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J].J Natl Compr Canc Netw，2019，17（1）：64-84.
Inoue T，Chihara T，Morita K.The prognostic significance of the size of the largest nodes in metastatic carcinoma from the uterine cervix[J].Gynecol Oncol，1984，19：187-193.
[20]
Toita T，Nakano M，Higashi M，et al.Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys，1995，33：843-849.
京公网安备 11010502046607号