缓解期双相情感障碍患者及其近亲属和正常人群认知功能对照研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(15)
相关文章 (13)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的比较双相情感障碍患者缓解期认知功能与其近亲属和正常人群的认知功能。方法选取我院2015年1月～2016年6月的50例缓解期双相情感障碍Ⅰ型患者作为研究1组，50例缓解期双相情感障碍Ⅱ型患者作为研究2组，抽取两研究组的50名健康近亲属作为亲属组及50名正常人群作为对照组进行研究，分别采用数字符号、连线测验A（TMT-A）时间、连线测验B（TMT-B）时间、数字广度（顺背、倒背、总分）和威斯康星卡片分类测验（WCST）评定接受测试者，比较各组的注意力、记忆功能和执行功能。结果研究1组和2组的TMT-A时间、TMT-B时间、数字广度（顺）高于亲属组和对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究1组的TMT-A时间、TMT-B时间长于研究2组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究1组和2组的数字广度（倒）、数字广度总分显著低于亲属组和对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。对照组的数字符号值显著高于其他三组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究1组、研究2组及亲属组WSCT的非持续性错误数、错误应答数显著高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究1组、亲属组WSCT的非持续性错误数、错误应答数显著高于研究2组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。研究1组和亲属组的完成分类数、不能维持完整分类数、完成第1个分类所需应答数、总应答数与研究2组、对照组比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论缓解期双相情感障碍Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型患者及其近亲属存在认知功能损害，Ⅰ型患者执行力损害较明显，Ⅱ型患者注意力较Ⅰ型损害明显。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胥德春
	张程赪

关键词 ：双相情感障碍, 近亲属, 认知功能, 缓解期, Ⅰ型, Ⅱ型

Abstract：ObjectiveTo compare the cognitive function between patients with bipolar affective disorder in remission period and its close relatives and normal population.Methods50 cases of bipolar affective disorder typeⅠpatients in remission period in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2016 were selected as the study group 1,50 cases of bipolar affective disorder typeⅡpatients in remission period were selected as the study group 2,50 cases healthy close relatives from two study groups were selected as the relatives group and 50 normal subjects were selected as the control group.All the subjects were assessed respectively by the digit symbol,trail making test A(TMT-A)time,trail making test B (TMT-B)time,digital breadth (forward,backward,total score)and Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST),and the attention,memory and executive function of each group were compared.ResultsThe TMT-A time,TMT-B time and digital breadth (forward)of the study group 1 and the study group 2 were higher than those in the relatives group and the control group,with significant difference (P＜0.05).The TMT-A time and TMT-B time of the study group 1 were longer than those of the study group 2,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The digital breadth(backward)and the total digital breadth score of the study group 1 and the study group 2 were significantly lower than those in the relatives group and the control group,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The number of digital symbols in the control group was significantly higher than that in the other three groups,with significant difference (P＜0.05).The non-persistent error number,error responses of WSCT in the study group 1,thestudy group 2 and the relatives group were significantly higher than that in the control group,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The non-persistent error number,error responses of WSCT in the study group 1 and the relatives group were significantly higher than that in the study group 2,with significant difference (P＜0.05).There was significant difference in the complete classification number,non-maintaining complete classification number and the number of responses required to complete the first classification and the number of total responses between the study group 1,the relatives group and the study group 2,the control group (P＜0.05).ConclusionThere are many cognitive impairment in patients with typeⅠand typeⅡin remission stage and their close relatives,and the damage of executive power in typeⅠpatients is more obvious,the damage of attention in typeⅡpatients is more obvious than that in typeⅠpatients.

Key words： Bipolar affective disorder Close relatives Cognitive function Remission period TypeⅠ TypeⅡ

基金资助:广东省韶关市卫生计生科研项目（Y15074）

引用本文:

胥德春;张程赪. 缓解期双相情感障碍患者及其近亲属和正常人群认知功能对照研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(18): 41-43转46.
XU De-chun;ZHANG Cheng-cheng. Comparative study of cognitive function in patients with bipolar affective disorder in remission period and their close relatives and normal population. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(18): 41-43转46.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2017/V24/I18/41

[1]	沈辉，张毅，陈美娟，等.双相情感障碍Ⅰ型患者病情缓解后认知功能的1年随访研究[J].临床精神医学杂志，2014，24（2）：97.
[2]	庚天琦，安妮，王喜今，等.双相心境障碍抑郁发作患病严重程度的影响因素分析[J].现代预防医学，2017，44（6）：1145-1148.
[3]	毛睿智，蒋正言.鉴别单相抑郁和双相抑郁的磁共振研究进展[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志，2013，39（10）：630-633.
[4]	杨梅，廖艳辉，王强，等.海洛因依赖者《美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册（第四版）》轴Ⅰ障碍的终身患病情况分析[J].中华精神科杂志，2013，46（1）：8-12.
[5]	黄悦琦，洪武，邱美慧，等.中国双相情感障碍不同躁狂发作亚型危险因素的现况调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2015，29（12）：927-932.
[6]	曹莉萍，林鄞，李烜，等.缓解期双相障碍Ⅰ型患者的认知功能及相关因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2009，23（10）：713-717.
[7]	El-Badri SM，Ashton CH，Moore PB，et al.Electrophysiological and cognitive function in young euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder[J].Bipolar Disorders，2015，3（2）：79-87.
[8]	徐宁，张广芬，余海鹰，等.抑郁症的表观遗传学机制研究进展[J].医学研究生学报，2016，29（10）：1093-1096.
[9]	张旭静，史占彪，徐夏菲，等.双相障碍患者家庭功能及亲密度适应性情况调查[J].第三军医大学学报，2013，35（23）：2592-2594.
[11]	黄成兵，陈桂兵.双相情感障碍患者的认知功能研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志，2012，18（6）：581.
[12]	吴伟娥，张程赪，张红英.全程综合心理干预对双相情感障碍认知功能的影响[J].临床心身疾病杂志，2011，17（6）：538.
[13]	杨静月，张蕾，朱春燕，等.双相情感障碍疼痛共情能力研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志，2015，41（12）：740-744.
[10]	Miskowiak KW，Ehrenreich H，Christensen EM，et al.Recombinant human erythropoietin to target cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder：a double-blind，randomized，placebocontrolled phase 2 trial[J].J Clin Psychiatry，2014，75（12）：1347-1355.
[14]	李谨，汪水利，李云庆，等.抑郁症易感基因的研究进展[J].神经解剖学杂志，2017，33（1）：103-106.
[15]	李涛，王强.精神分裂症和双相障碍的遗传交叠及其对精神疾病分类的影响[J].上海精神医学，2010，22（2）：65-68.