Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the application effect of body surface marking localization and ultrasound-guided localization in parturients anesthesia of cesarean section.MethodsFrom January 2015 to December 2016,80 parturients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital were selected and given spinal epidural anesthesia.The patients were divided into the body surface group and the ultrasonic group by random number table method,40 cases in each group.The surface group was punctured by traditional body surface location,while the ultrasound group was punctured by ultrasound-guided.The localization time of pre-anesthesia,the number of times of puncture and the number of epidural anesthesia were compared between the two groups,and the incidence rate of anesthesia related complications in the two groups was counted.ResultsThe localization time of pre-anesthesia in the ultrasound group was longer than that in the surface group,and the successful rate of first puncture in the ultrasound group was higher than that of surface group,with significant difference(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the proportion of epidural anesthesia between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence rate of complications such as catheter bleeding,nerve stimulation signs,paresthesia of the lower extremities and postoperative low back pain in the ultrasound group was significantly lower than that in the surface group,with significant difference (P<0.05).ConclusionUltrasound-guided localization of lumbar-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section can effectively improve the success rate of puncture and reduce the incidence rate of anesthesia-related complications.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
麦亚强;温金鸿. 体表标志定位与超声引导定位在剖宫产产妇麻醉中的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(20): 128-130.
MAI Ya-qiang;WEN Jin-hong. Application effect of body surface marking localization and ultrasoundguided localization in parturients anesthesia of cesarean section. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(20): 128-130.
Grau T,Leipold RW,Conradi R,et al.Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia[J].Clin Anesth,2012,24(3):169-175.
[7]
Grau T,Leipold RW,Conradi R,et al.Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia[J].Rag Anesth Pain Med,2011,36(1):64-67.
[8]
Arzola C,Davies S,Rofaeel A,et al.Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals[J].Anesth Analg,2016,113(5):1188-1192.
[9]
Balki M.Locating the epidural space in obstetric patientsultrasound a useful tool:continuing professional development[J].Can J Anesth,2010,57(12):1111-1126.
[10]
Pallasmaa N,Ekblad U,Aitokallio-Tallberg A,et al.Cesarean delivery in Finland:maternal complications and obstetric risk factors[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2015,94(14):896-902.
Sahin T,Balaban O,Sahin L,et al.A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy:outcomes among obese and lean parturients:ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy[J].J Anesth,2014,28(3):413-419.
[12]
Whitty R,Moore M,Macarthur A.Identication of the lumbar interspinous spaces:palpation versus ultrasound[J].Anesth Analg,2015,113(2):538-540.
[15]
Grau T.Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,2014,39(4):64-67.