Abstract：Objective To explore the safety of minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation for the treatment of limb fractures.Methods A total of 40 patients with limb fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected.They were divided into control group(n=20)and research group(n=20)according to the treatment protocol.In the control group,open reduction with compression plate was used,while in the research group,minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation was adopted.The efficacy and safety of the corresponding treatment protocols as interventions in the two groups were compared.Results In the research group,the operation time was(91.35±9.32)min,shorter than that of the control group([115.66±10.94]min)(P<0.05).The hospital stay in the research group was(14.22±5.31)d,shorter than that in the control group([19.92±6.36]d)(P<0.05).The time of fracture healing in the research group were(14.32±4.98)d,shorter than that in the control group([22.46±5.22]d)(P<0.05).Intraoperative blood loss in the research group were(88.31±12.66)ml,lesser in the control group([270.14±50.64]ml)(P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of the joint function recovery in research group was 90.00%,higher than that of the control group accounting for 60.00%(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the research group was 5.0%,much lower than that of the control group accounting for 30.00%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with open reduction,the minimally invasive percutaneous plate fixation for patients with limb fractures is effective.The operation is better and the incidence of complications is lower.It has higher safety and is easier to accept by patients,which is worth promoting in clinical practice.
京公网安备 11010502046607号