Abstract：ObjectiveTo study the influence on anti-mullerian hormone (AMH)with different operation methods under laparoscope in treatment of salpingoeyesis.MethodsA total of 60 patients with tubal pregnancy from January 2015 to January 2017 were randomly divided into three groups with 20 cases in each group.For GroupⅠ,the monopolar electrical hook was adopted to eliminate the side fallopian tube with coagulation.For groupⅡ,the fallopian tube was ligated two times from the umbrella end to the cornual membrane near the isthmus using on DEXON thread before removing the fallopian tube.For groupⅢ,the lateral fallopian tube was resected after the tubal mesangial membrane was bipolar electrocoagulated.The radio-immunity method was employed to monitor the level of AMH and antral follicle count(AFC)in the affected side in the preoperative and 1,3 and 6 months postoperative periods.Through statistical analysis and comparison,the impacts to the ovarian reserve function due to different operation methods of fallopian tubal resection were observed.Results①The levels of AMH were in normal range before and after the operation.②there was no significant difference(P＞0.05)between preoperative AMH and AFC within the group ofⅠ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ before the operation.③In the 1 month after surgery,AMH and AFC all declined in groupⅠ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ,while AMH and AFC in group Ⅱdecreased significantly the difference were statistically significant(P<0.05).④In each time point after surgery,AMH and AFC of three groups,after surgery 3,6 months with compared before surgery,was not statistically significant(P＞0.05).ConclusionThree types of tubal resection of laparoscopic tube may have certain effects on the function of the ovary,with the ligation and resection method having a slightly greater impact on the ovarian reserve function.
Broekmans FJ，Kee J，Hendrinks DJ，et al.A systematic review of tests predidting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome[J].Hum Reprod Update，2006，12（6）：685-718.
[5]
van Rooij IA，Broekmans FJ，Hunault CC，et al.Use of ovarian reserve tests for the prediction of ongoing preganancy in couples with unexplained or mild male infertility[J].Reprod Biomed Online，2006，12（2）：182-190.
[6]
Grynnerup AG，A Lindhard，S Sorensen.Anti-Mullerian hormone levelsinsalpingectomized comparedwithnonsalpingectomized women with tubal factor infertility and women with unexplained infertility[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand，2013，92（11）：1297-1303.
[7]
Keskin U.Changes in the ovarian stromal blood flow in patients treated with laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy[J].J Obstet Gynaecol，2013，33（4）：399-402.
Christianson MS，Tobler KJ，Shoham G，et al.Use of anti-mullerian hormonefor testingovarianreserve：a survey of 796 infertility clinics worldwide[J].J Assist Reprod Genet，2015，32（10）：1441-1448.
[10]
Wood MA，Rajkovic A.Genomic markers of ovarian reserve[J].Semin Reprod Med，2013，31（6）：399-415.
[11]
La Marca A，Sighinolfi G，Radi D，et al.Anti-Mullerian hormone（AMH）as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology（ART）[J].Hum Reprod Update，2010，16（2）：113-130.
[12]
Alipour F，Rasekhjahromi A，Maalhagh M，et al.Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of AMH and FSH in diagnosis of premature ovarian failure[J].Dis Markers，2015，2015（5）：1-4.
[13]
Park HJ，Lee GH，Gong du S，et al.The meaning of anti-Müllerian hormone levels in patients at a high risk of poor ovarian response[J].Clin Exp Reprod Med，2016，43（3）：139-145.
[14]
Tobler KJ，Shoham G，Christianson MS，et al.Use of antimullerian hormone for testing ovarian reserve：a survey of 796 infertility clinics worldwide[J].J Assist Reprod Genet，2015，32（1）
京公网安备 11010502046607号