Abstract:Objective To compare the diagnostic and treatment of emergency gastroscopy and common endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.M ethods Clinical data of 39 patients given emergency gastroscopy from September 2012 to September 2015 was retrospectively analyzed and the control group given common gastroscope for the same period,the etiology diagnosis rate,the bleeding rate and blood transfusion rate during operation of patients in two groups were observed and analyzed.Results The etiology diagnosis rate of the observation group was higher(89.74%vs 66.67%,χ2=6.093,P<0.05);the bleeding rate and blood transfusion rate during operation were different(χ2=8.773,4.198, P<0.05);no serious complications(perforation,massive hemorrhage,drug allergy,sudden death)occurred in both groups. Conclusion There was high value of emergency endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage,the etiology diagnosis rate was high;hemostatic rate under scope is high;blood transfusion rate during operation was low which should be promoted and applied.
王小芹;丁志刚. 急诊胃镜与普通胃镜对上消化道出血的诊治价值[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(32): 35-37.
WANG Xiao-qin;DING Zhi-gang. Diagnostic and treatment value of emergency gastroscopy and common gastroscope for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(32): 35-37.