Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic combined with uterine curettage in the treatment of uterine scar pregnancy.Methods A total of 102 patients with uterine scar pregnancy who admitted to our hospital from February 2015 t0 March 2018 were selected.They were equally divided into intervention group and control group by computer randomization, 51 cases in each group.In the intervention group, laparoscopic combined with surgery was adopted, while in the control group, traditional curettage was performed.The occurrence of postoperative complications of the two groups was evaluated.The time of various indexes returning to normal during and after surgery was evaluated.Results In the intervention group, the operation time, the time of vaginal bleeding, the time of menstruation returning to normal, the time of blood β-HCG returning to normal, and the hospital stay were lower than those of the control group (t=10.785, 7.067, 8.463, 6.394, 7.192; P<0.05), the amount of intraoperative blood loss was less than those of the control group (t=0.635, P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the intervention group was7.84% (n=4), lower than that in the control group accounting for 21.57% (n=11) (χ2=7.515, P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with uterine curettage, laparoscopic combined with surgery is effective in treating uterine scar pregnancy at advantages of short operation time, lower intraoperative blood loss, more favorable postoperative recovery effect, and lower risk of complications.