Abstract:Objective To explore the diagnostic value of 3.0T magnetic resonance enterography (MRE)technology for active small bowel Crohn disease(CD).Methods A total of 23 inpatients suspected with active small bowel CD treated in Hainan People′s Hospital from January 2015 to January 2017 were given 3.0T MRE,Imaging features and signal characteristics of small bowel lesions scanned in different phases were analyzed.The results of pathological examination by enteroscopy were the gold standard,the sensitivity and specificity of the scanning method in diagnosing small bowel CD were analyzed.Results The MRI image features of small intestinal CD lesions were multiple segmental thickening and abnormal enhancement of intestinal wall,morphological fixation,signal elevation and heterogeneity,comb sign,intestinal stenosis or dilatation.There was no significant difference in signal intensity of small intestinal lesions in different phases,intestinal wall and lumen changes between plain scan and enhancement(P>0.05).The sensitivity of MRE in diagnosing small bowel CD was 100%,the specificity was 83.33%.The accuracy rate of MRE in diagnosis of small bowel CD was 95.65%,and there was no significant difference between MRE and enteroscopy (P>0.05).Conclusion The small bowel CD lesions have characteristic changes under MRE scanning.MRE can improve the accuracy rate of judging small intestinal CD,and the specificity needs to be further improved.
董丽伟;庄晓曌;王飞;赵应满;李建军;何周桃;陈益耀;蓝程. 3.0T磁共振小肠成像对活动期小肠克罗恩病的诊断价值研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(26): 4-07.
DONG Li-wei;ZHUANG Xiao-zhao;WANG Fei;ZHAO Ying-man;LI Jian-jun;HE Zhou-tao;CHEN Yi-yao;LAN Cheng. Study the diagnostic value of 3.0T magnetic resonance enterography in patients with active small bowel Crohn disease. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(26): 4-07.
Rosenfeld G,Brown J,Vos PM,et al.Prospective comparison of standard-versus low-radiation-dose ct enterography for the quantitative assessment of Crohn disease[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2018,210(2):W54-W62.
[2]
Yung DE,Har-Noy O,Tham YS,et al.Capsule endoscopy,magnetic resonance enterography,and small bowel ultrasound for evaluation of postoperative recurrence in Crohn′s disease:systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].Inflamm Bowel Dis,2017,24(1):93-100.
[3]
Baker ME,Hara AK,Platt JF,et al.CT enterography for Crohn′s disease:optimal technique and imaging issues[J].Abdom Imaging,2015,40(5):938-952.
[4]
Park MJ,Lim JS.CT enterography for Crohn′s disease[J].Clin Endosc,2013,46(4):327-366.
[5]
Yoon HM,Suh CH,Kim JR,et al.Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance enterography for detection of active inflammation in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease;a system review and diagnostic meta-analysis[J].JAMA Pediatr,2017,171(12):1208-1216.
[6]
Liu W,Liu J,Xiao W,et al.A diagnostic accuracy Metaanalysis of CT and MRI for the evaluation of small boewl Crhon Disease[J].Acad Radiol,2017,24(10):1216-1225.
Kosplay M,Guneyli S,Cebeci H,et al.Magnetic resonance enterography with oral mannitol solution:Diagnostic efficacy and image quality in Crohn′s disease[J].Diagn Interv Imaging,2017,98(12):893-899.
[9]
Ognibene NM,Basile M,Di Maurizio M,et al.Features and perspectives of MR enterography for pediatric Crohn[J]disease assessment[J].Radiol Med,2016,121(5):362-377.
[10]
Macarini L,Stoppinol LP,Centola A,et al.Assessment of activity of Crhon′s disease of the ileum and large bowel:proposal for a new multiparameter MR enterography score[J].Radiol Med,2013,118(2):181-195.
[11]
Rimola J,Alvarez-Cofino A,Pérez-Jeldres T,et al.Increasing efficiency of MRE for diagnosis of Crohn′s disease activity through proper sequence selection:a practical approach for clinical trials[J].Abdom Radiol(NY),2017,42 (12):2783-2791.
[12]
Cullmann JL,Bickelhaupt S,Froehlich JM,et al.MR imaging Crhon′s disease:correlation of MR motility measurement with histopathology in the terminal ileum[J].Neurogastroneterol Motil,2013,25(9):749-e577.
[13]
Fujii T,Naganuma M,Kitazume Y,et al.Advancing magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn′s disease[J].Digestion,2014,89(1):24-30.
[14]
González-Suárez B,Rodriguez S,Ricart E,et al.Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance enterography for the assessment of small bowel lesions in Crohn′s disease[J].Inflamm Bowel Dis,2018,24(4):775-780.
[15]
Kopylov U,Yung DE,Engel T,et al.Diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy versus magnetic resonance enterography and small bowel contrast ultrasound in the evaluation of small bowel Crohn′s disease:Systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Dig Liver Dis,2017,49(8):854-863.
[16]
Kim KJ,Lee Y,Park SH,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR enterography for evaluating Crohn′s disease:how does it add diagnostically to conventional MR enterography?[J].Inflamm Bowel Dis,2015,21(1):101-109.
[17]
Kaushal P,Somwaru AS,Charabaty A,et al.MR enterography of inflammatory bowel disease with endoscopic correlation[J].Radiographics,2017,37(1):116-131.
[18]
OhtsukaK,TakenakaK,KitazumeY,etal.Magneticresonance enterography for the evaluation of the deep small intestine in Crohnvs disease[J].Intest Res,2016,14(2):120-126.
[19]
Moy MP,Sauk J,Gee MS.The role of MR enterography in assessing Crohn′s disease activity and treatment response[J].Gastroenterol Res Pract,2016,2016(1):1-13.
[20]
Thomassin L,Armengol-Debeir L,Charpentier C,et al.Magnetic resonance imaging may predict deep remission in patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn′s disease[J].World J Gastroenterol,2017,23(23):4285-4292.
[23]
Yoon K,Chang KT,Lee HJ.MRI for Crohn′s disease:Present and future[J].Biomed Res Int,2015,2015:786802.
[21]
Lunder AK,Jahnsen J,Bakstad LT,et al.Bowel damage in patientswithlong-termCrohn′sdisease,assessedbymagnetic resonance enterography and the Lémann index[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2018,16(1):75-82.
[22]
Quaia E,Sozzi M,Gennari AG,et al.Impact of gadoliniumbased contrast agent in the assessment of Crohn′s disease activity:is contrast agent injection necessary?[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2016,43(3):688-697.