Abstract:Objective To compare and analyze the clinical value of two imaging techniques of CT and MRI in preoperative diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.Methods A total of 76 patients with invasive cervical cancer who were confirmed by pathological examination after operation in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2017 were selected and divided into the control group and the study group according to their different inspection methods before operation,there were 38 cases in each group.The control group received CT examination before operation,and the study group received MRI examination before operation.The imaging diagnosis operation time,preoperative dispute diagnosis,coincidence rate of preoperative diagnosis and postoperative pathological examination,misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe disputes caused preoperative diagnosis in the study group was only 1 cases(2.6%),which was less than 8 cases(21.1%)in the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).The coincidence rate of cervical cancer preoperative diagnosis and postoperative pathological examination results in the study group was 94.7%,which was higher than 63.2%in the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).The rate of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis in the study group were less than that in the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the time of imaging diagnosis between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Invasive cervical cancer patients who were diagnosed by MRI before surgery,although the operation time will be extended to a certain extent,but its accuracy is higher,which can effectively reduce the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis cases,the disputes caused by disease diagnosis can be controlled,so that more effective treatment time can be obtained for patients.