Abstract：Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of development screening test(DST)in the evaluation of infant development.Methods Infants and children in 0-6 years old who were treated in Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation of Guizhou Provincial People′s Hospital during the period of April 1,2016 to March 31,2017 were selected as the subject of this research.The DSTs of the subject were evaluated by two highly trained professional evaluators to analyze the reliability of their interviewer.The subjects also participated in the Peabody sports development test,which was used as a gold standard assessment tool to analyze the copolymerization validity of DST.Results A total of 174 children(male 99 cases,56.9%)were included in this study,with an average age of(10.23±9.43)months.The developmental quotient(DQ)score in DST was(67.83±19.63)points,and the mental index(MI)score was(61.94±15.9)points.The DQ and MI scores of girls were all higher than those of boys,with statistically significant difference(P＜0.05).The intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC)value of each dimension of DST was between 0.76-0.89,and the results showed that there was a good correlation between the interviewers′score.The correlation coefficients between gross motor operator(GMQ),fine motion operator(FMQ),total motion operator(TMQ)in Peabody and DQ,MI scores of DST were 0.59 vs.0.57,0.62 vs.0.68,0.63 vs.0.64,respectively.The correlation coefficient of Peabody in gross motor between reflection,posture,mobile score and DQ,MI were 0.42 vs.0.36,0.54 vs.0.50,0.56 vs.0.58;the correlation coefficient of grasping and visual motor integration in fine motor and DQ and MI scores were 0.65 vs.0.70,0.62 vs.0.68;each dimension of DST was best correlated with fine motor in the Peabody and slightly lower correlated with gross motor dimensions.Conclusion DST has good inter-interviewer reliability and copolymerization validity,indicating that the test is a reliable and effective tool for motor development screening in Chinese children.
刘烨;李家琼;熊才运;王耀洲;罗林荫;崔玉霞;周浩. 发育筛查量表的评价者间信度和共聚效度分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(11): 4-7.
LIU Ye;LI Jia-qiong;XIONG Cai-yun;WANG Yao-zhou;LUO Lin-yin;CUI Yu-xia;ZHOU Hao. Evaluation of the interviewer reliability and copolymerization validity of the development screening test. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(11): 4-7.
Draper CE，Tomaz SA，Stone M，et al.Developing intervention strategies to optimise body composition in early childhood in South Africa[J].Biomed Res Int，2017[Published online].
[2]
Uauy R，Corvalan C，Casanello P，et al.Intervention strategies for preventing low birthweight in developing countries：importance of considering multiple interactive factors[J].Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser，2013，74（3）：31-52.
[3]
Crnic KA，Neece CL，Mcintyre LL，et al.Intellectual disability and developmental risk：promoting intervention to improve child and family well-being[J].Child Dev，2017，88（2）：436-445.
[4]
Gebhard AR，Ottenbacher KJ，Lane SJ.Interrater reliability of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales：fine motor scale[J].Am J Occup Ther，1994，48（11）：976-981.
[5]
Lenaert B，Boddez Y，Griffith JW，et al.Aversive learning and generalization predict subclinical levels of anxiety：a six-month longitudinal study[J].J Anxiety Disord，2014，28（8）：747-753.
[6]
Accardo PJ.50 years ago in the Journal of Pediatrics：the pedictability of Gesell developmental scales in Mongolism[J].J Pediatr，2013，162（1）：55.
[7]
Dai XY，Ryan JJ，Paolo AM，et al.Factor analysis of the mainland Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale （WAIS-RC） in a brain-damaged sample[J].Int J Neurosci，1990，55（2-4）：107-111.
[8]
Brito CM，Vieira GO，Costa MC，et al.Neuropsychomotor development：the Denver scale for screening cognitive and neuromotor delays in preschoolers[J].Cad Saude Publica，2011，27（7）：1403-1414.
Athanasiadou E，Kyrkou C，Fotiou M，et al.Development and validation of a mediterranean oriented culture-specific semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire[J].Nutrients，2016，8（9）：522.
京公网安备 11010502046607号