Abstract：ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical difference of laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparotomy in patients with uterine fibroids.MethodsFrom May 2015 to April 2017,82 patients with hysteromyoma who treated in our hospital were selected as objects.They were divided into observation group(n=41)and control group(n=41)according to random number table method.The control group was treated with open hysterectomy,and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic total hysterectomy.The operation time,bleeding volume,postoperative exhaust time,hospitalization time,FSH level and complication rate were compared between the two groups.ResultsOperation time was compared between the two groups,the difference was not statistically significant(P＞0.05),the patients in the observation group had less blood loss than the control group,the postoperative ventilation time and the hospitalization time were shorter than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Before treatment,the level of FSH was compared between the two groups,the difference was not statistically significant(P＞0.05).After treatment,the level of FSH of the patients in the observation group were compared with before treatment,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).In the complication rate,the control group was much higher than the observation group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic hysterectomy compared with open surgery,it has many advantages in clinical application,to ensure the normal operation time,shorten surgery time and hospitalization time,reduce the amount of hemorrhage,improve the level of FSH,reduce the incidence of complications,can be popularized in clinical treatment.
陈卫忠 ；张飞飞 ；何玲燕. 子宫肌瘤患者腹腔镜下全子宫切除术与开腹手术的临床疗效比较研究[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(29): 78-80.
CHEN Wei-zhong ；ZHANG Fei-fei；HE Ling-yan. Comparative study of laparoscopic total hysterectomy and laparotomy in patients with uterine fibroids. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(29): 78-80.
京公网安备 11010502046607号