个性化优质护理干预在磁共振成像检查中的应用

摘要
图/表
参考文献(19)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (40 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨个性化优质护理干预在磁共振成像（MRI）检查过程中的应用效果。方法选取2020年9—10月在南通大学附属丰县医院行MRI 检查的200 例患者，按照随机数字表法分为对照组（n=100）与实验组（n=100），对照组采用常规护理措施，实验组在对照组基础上采用个性化优质护理干预模式。比较两组患者检查前后焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分、抑郁自评量表（SDS）评分，并对两组检查时间、MRI 图像质量优良率、护理满意度及护理风险事件发生率进行比较。结果实验组干预后的SAS、SDS 评分低于对照组，且实验组的检查时间短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；实验组图像优良率及护理满意度高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；实验组护理风险事件发生率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论个性化优质护理干预可明显改善患者负性情绪，缩短检查时间，提高图像质量及护理满意度，降低护理风险事件发生率。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：磁共振成像检查, 不良事件, 护理风险, 护理干预, 检查质量

Abstract：Objective To explore the application effect of personalized high-quality nursing intervention in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Methods A total of 200 patients undergoing MRI examination in Nantong University Affiliated Fengxian Hospital from September to October 2020 were selected and divided into the control group(n=100) and the experimental group (n=100) according to the random number table method. Patients in the control group were given conventional nursing measures, and patients in the experimental group were given personalized highquality nursing intervention mode on the basis of the control group. The scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) before and after examination were compared between the two groups, and the examination times, excellent and good rates of MRI image quality, nursing satisfactions and the incidence of nursing risk events were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group, and the examination time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The excellent and good rate of MRI image quality and nursing satisfaction of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The incidence of nursing risk events in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Personalized high quality nursing intervention can significantly improve patients′ negative emotions, shorten examination time, improve image quality and nursing satisfaction, and reduce the incidence of nursing risk events.

Key words： Magnetic resonance imaging examination Adverse event Nursing risk Nursing intervention Examination quality

收稿日期: 2020-11-20

基金资助:江苏省卫生科研项目（YG2014019）

作者简介: 仇志敏（1977-），女，江苏丰县人，副主任护师，护士长，主要从事CT 与MRI 影像护理工作

引用本文:

仇志敏；丁长青；刘维；袁艳菊；张亚萍；朱敏. 个性化优质护理干预在磁共振成像检查中的应用[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(19): 241-245.
QIU Zhi-min DING Chang-qing LIU Wei YUAN Yan-ju ZHANG Ya-ping ZHU Min. Application of personalized high quality nursing intervention in magnetic resonance imaging. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(19): 241-245.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2021/V28/I19/241

[1]	Sammet S.Magnetic resonance safety[J].Abdom Radiol（NY），2016，41（3）：444-451.
[2]	边喜英.基于安全舒适需求的双视角护理干预在核磁共振检查患者中的应用效果[J].泰山医学院学报，2018，39（6）：665-667.
[3]	余静萍，卓水清，吴慧瑜.优化护理干预措施在磁共振成像检查中的意义[J].当代护士，2019，26（21）：121-123.
[4]	赖文娟，陈秀华，黄奕巧.风险护理管理模式在磁共振检查患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志，2019，25（8）：129-131.
[5]	宋晓群.磁共振成像检查的护理风险相关因素分析与防范对策[J].全科护理，2010，8（1）：55-56.
[6]	Lum M，Tsiouris AJ. MRI safety considerations during pregnancy[J].Clin Imaging，2020，62：69-75.
[7]	Callaghan MF，Negus C，Leff AP，et al.Safety of Tattoos in Persons Undergoing MRI[J].N Engl J Med，2019，380（5）：495-496.
[8]	Bussmann S，Luechinger R，Froehlich JM，et al.Safety of intrauterine devices in MRI[J].PLoS One，2018，13（10）：e0204220.
[9]	Mosher ZA，Sawyer JR，Kelly DM.MRI Safety with Orthopedic Implants[J].Orthop Clin North Am，2018，49（4）：455-463.
[10]	Stonier G，Hardee P. MRI safety：MRI and fixed orthodontic appliances[J].Br Dent J，2018，225（8）：684.
[11]	Srinivasan R，So CW，Amin N，et al.A review of the safety of MRI in cochlear implant patients with retained magnets[J].Clin Radiol，2019，74（12）：972.
[12]	Nazarian S，Hansford R，Rahsepar AA，et al.Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices[J].N Engl J Med，2017，377（26）：2555-2564.
[13]	张卫，刘锡丹，周龙龙，等.含钆造影剂不良反应的文献分析[J].现代医药卫生，2019，35（18）：2802-2805.
[14]	陈荣萍，文正青，罗方，等.音乐疗法+心理护理干预在幽闭恐惧症病人行磁共振成像中的应用研究[J].全科护理，2020，18（4）：451-454.
[15]	崔兆瑞，骆春柳，李海瑞.短时强化饮水及水化护理预防心脏MRI 检查后肾损伤的效果[J].护理实践与研究，2020，17（6）：143-145.
[16]	王艺霏，李雪梅，刘旭东.临床与影像护理干预对脑卒中磁共振检查患者SAS、SDS 评分的影响[J].现代医学与健康研究，2020，4（9）：102-103.
[17]	中华人民共和国卫生部.医用磁共振成像（MRI）设备影像质量检测与评价规范（WS/T263-2006）[S]．2006：1-12．
[18]	刘雅文，尹红霞，杨娉娉，等.MRI 设备临床质量控制流程和制度的现状与发展趋势[J].中国医学影像技术，2017，33（11）：1615-1619.
[19]	陈红，翟建，陶秀彬.老年核磁共振增强检查者接受全程精细化护理的效果分析[J].皖南医学院学报，2020，39（1）：97-99.