不同分娩方式对剖宫产术后再次妊娠妊娠结局和新生儿情况的影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (40 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨不同分娩方式对剖宫产术后再次妊娠妊娠结局和新生儿情况的影响。方法选取2018年1月～2019年1月我院收治的535 例剖宫产术后再次妊娠自然临产产妇作为研究对象，按照产妇意愿选择不同分娩方式，分为剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产（TOLAC）组（182 例）和选择再次剖宫产（ERCS）组（353 例）。 TOLAC 组根据最终分娩方式分为TOLAC 成功组（135 例）和TOLAC 失败组（47 例）。记录TOLAC 成功率、阴道助产率、试产失败中转剖宫产率及原因。比较三组的基本情况、产妇分娩并发症及新生儿情况；分析TOLAC 组的阴道试产情况。结果 ERCS 组距离前次剖宫产时间长于TOLAC 成功组和TOLAC 失败组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。TOLAC 阴道试产成功率为74.2%（135/182），阴道助产率为6.7%（9/135），中转剖宫产率为25.8%（47/182）。三组的产后出血量、严重产后出血发生率、输血率、凝血功能障碍、不完全性子宫破裂、肠梗阻、深静脉血栓发生率、新生儿出生体重及新生儿窒息发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；TOLAC 成功组的宫缩乏力发生率低于TOLAC 失败组和ERCS 组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；TOLAC 成功组的产褥感染发生率低于ERCS 组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；TOLAC 失败组的绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率高于ERCS 组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论在严格掌握TOLAC 适应证的前提下，剖宫产术后再次妊娠自然临产产妇选择阴道分娩是安全可行的，TOLAC 阴道试产成功率在70%以上，与ERCS 相比，TOLAC 减少产褥感染发生及缩短住院时间，有较好的母婴结局。 TOLAC 失败增加绒毛膜羊膜炎发生，产程中应严密监测母婴情况。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张珊珊
	梁旭霞
	韦艳芬

关键词 ：瘢痕子宫, 再次妊娠, 分娩方式, 分娩结局

Abstract：Objective To investigate the effect of different delivery methods on pregnant again pregnancy outcome and neonatal status after cesarean section. Methods A total of 535 cases of pregnant again natural labor after cesarean section who were admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected as the research object, they were divided into vaginal trial of second pregnancy after cesarean section (TOLAC) group (182 patients) and the choice of second cesarean section (ERCS) group (353 patients), different delivery methods were selected according to the wishes of the mother. The TOLAC group was divided into the TOLAC success group (135 cases) and the TOLAC failure group (47 cases) according to the final delivery method. The success rate of TOLAC, vaginal assisted delivery, and trial delivery failure to cesarean delivery were recorded. The basic conditions, maternal delivery complications, and neonatal conditions of the three groups were compared; the vaginal trials of the TOLAC group were analyzed. Results The time since previous cesarean section in the ERCS group was longer than that of TOLAC successful group and TOLAC failure group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The success rate of TOLAC vaginal delivery was 74.2%(135/182), the vaginal delivery rate was 6.7% (9/135),and the rate of transfer to cesarean section was 25.8%(47/182). There were no significant differences in the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, incidence of serious postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion rate, coagulation dysfunction, incomplete uterine rupture, intestinal obstruction, incidence of deep vein thrombosis, birth weight of newborn and incidence of neonatal asphyxia among the three groups (P＞0.05). The incidence rate of tocolytic weakness in the TOLAC success group was lower than that in the TOLAC failure group and the ERCS group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The incidence rate of puerperal infection in the TOLAC successful group was lower than that in the ERCS group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The incidence rate of chorioamnionitis in the TOLAC failure group was higher than that in the ERCS group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Under the premise of strictly grasping the indications of TOLAC, it is safe and feasible for vaginal delivery of natural parturients to be pregnant again after cesarean section. The success rate of TOLAC vaginal delivery is more than 70%. Compared with ERCS, TOLAC reduces the incidence of puerperal infections. And shorten the length of hospitalization, have a better outcome of mother and child. The failure of TOLAC increases the incidence of chorioamnionitis, and the mother and infant situation should be closely monitored during the labor process.

Key words： Scarred uterus Pregnant again Delivery methods Pregnancy outcome

基金资助:广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研资助项目（Z20180730）

通讯作者: 梁旭霞（1968-），女，广西河池人，本科，主任医师，产科主任，主要研究方向：高危重疑难孕产妇的救治与管理

作者简介: 张珊珊（1982-），女，广西南宁人，硕士，主治医师，主要研究方向：围产医学及高危妊娠处理

引用本文:

张珊珊；梁旭霞；韦艳芬. 不同分娩方式对剖宫产术后再次妊娠妊娠结局和新生儿情况的影响[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(7): 117-120转124.
ZHANG Shan-shan； LIANG Xu-xia; WEI Yan-fen. Effect of different delivery methods on pregnant again pregnancy outcome and neonatal status after cesarean section. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(7): 117-120转124.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2020/V27/I7/117

[1]	Mirteymouri M，Ayati S，Pourali L，et al.Evaluation of maternal-neonatal outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery referred to maternity of academic hospitals[J].J Family Reprod Health，2016，10（4）：206-210.
[2]	Landon MB，Grobman WA.What we have learned about trial oflaborafter cesareandelivery from the maternal-fetalmedicine units cesarean registry[J].Semin Perinatol，2016，40（5）：281-286.
[3]	时春艳，李博雅.新产程标准及处理的专家共识（2014）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（7）：486.
[4]	中华医学会妇产科学分会产组.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩管理的专家共识（2016）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2016，51（8）：561-564.
[5]	中华医学会妇产科学分会产组.产后出血预防及处理指南（2014）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（9）：641-646.
[6]	中华医学会围产医学分会新生儿复苏学组.新生儿窒息诊断的专家共识[J].中华围产医学杂志，2016，19（1）：3-6.
[7]	Tsakiridis I，Mamopoulos A，Athanasiadis A，et al.Vaginal birth after previous cesarean birth：a comparison of 3 national guidelines[J].Obstet Gynecol Surv，2018，73（9）：537-543.
[8]	周莉娜，洪莉.卡贝缩宫素联合Bakri 子宫球囊控制产后出血的效果[J].中国医药杂志，2019，14（1）：108-112.
[9]	Modi BP，Teves ME，Pearson LN，et al.Rare mutations and potentially damaging missense variants in genes encoding fibrillar collagens and proteins involved in their production are candidates for risk for preterm premature rupture of membranes[J].PLoS One，2017，12（3）：e0174356-e0174370.
[10]	中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.胎膜早破的诊断与处理指南（2015）[J]. 中华围产医学杂志，2015，18（3）：161-167.
[11]	何镭，陈锰，何国琳.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩孕妇的妊娠结局分析[J].中华妇产科杂志，2016，51（8）：586-591.
[14]	王子莲，陈海天，王晶.产时电子胎心监护的应用[J].实用妇产科杂志，2019，1（35）：10-12.
[12]	Ganer Herman H，Kogan Z，Bar-Nof T，et al.Cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart rate-the effect of phase of labor on subsequent vaginal delivery success[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med，2019，1（3）：1-15.
[13]	American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.ACOG Practice bulletin No.184：vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[J].Obstet Gynecol，2017，116（2Pt1）：450-456.
[15]	Society for Maternal -Fetal Medicine （SMFM），Pacheco LD，Saade G，et al.Amniotic fluid embolism：diagnosis and management[J].J Obstet Gynecol，2016，215（2）：B16-24.
[16]	Jeejeebhoy FM，Zelop CM，Lipman S，et al.Cardiac arrest in pregnancy：a scie ntific statement from the American heart association[J].Circulation，2015，132（18）：1747-1773．