开展胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术初期临床经验总结

摘要
图/表
参考文献(15)
相关文章 (12)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的通过胸腹腔联合食管癌根治术与传统开胸手术术中、术后相关数据比较，总结相关临床经验。方法回顾性分析2017年5月～2018年5月我院收治的69例食管癌患者的临床资料，按照不同手术方式将其分为微创组（28例）与开放组（41例）。微创组患者行胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术治疗，开放组患者行传统开胸手术治疗。比较两组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、淋巴结清扫数目、术后胸腔引流量、胸腔引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间及术后肺部并发症总发生率。结果微创组患者的手术时间长于开放组，术中出血量及术后引流量均少于开放组，淋巴结清扫数目多于开放组，胸腔引流管拔除时间短于开放组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；两组患者的术后住院时间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。微创组患者的术后肺部并发症总发生率为31.7%，明显低于开放组的7.1%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术的效果明显优于传统开胸手术，值得广泛推广。但对于在开展微创食管癌根治手术初期的术者来说经验尚不丰富。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	易和强
	陈光明
	刘浩

关键词 ：胸腹腔镜, 开胸手术, 食管癌根治

Abstract：Objective To summarize the relevant clinical experience by comparing the intraoperative and postoperative data of thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer surgery and traditional thoracotomy.Methods The clinical data of 69 patients with esophageal cancer admitted to our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into minimally invasive group(28 cases)and open group(41 cases)according to different surgical methods.Patients in the minimally invasive group underwent thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer surgery,and patients in the open group underwent traditional thoracotomy.The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,number of lymph node dissection,volume of postoperative thoracic drainage,removal time of thoracic drainage tube,postoperative hospitalization time and total incidence rate of postoperative pulmonary complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time in the minimally invasive group was longer than that in the open group,the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative thoracic drainage volume were less than those in the open group,the number of lymph node dissection was more than that in the open group,and the removal time of thoracic drainage tube was shorter than that in the open group,with statistically significant differences(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups(P＞0.05).The total incidence rate of postoperative pulmonary complications in the minimally invasive group was 31.7%,which was significantly lower than that in the open group(7.1%),and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion The effect of thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer surgery is significantly better than that of traditional thoracotomy,which is worthy of widespread promotion.However,the experience of the early stage of radical surgery for minimally invasive esophageal cancer is not rich to operators.

Key words： Thoracic laparoscopy Thoracotomy Radical resection of esophageal cancer

引用本文:

易和强; 陈光明; 刘浩. 开展胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术初期临床经验总结[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(17): 57-60.
YI He-qiang; CHEN Guang-ming; LIU Hao. Summary of clinical experience in the initial stage of thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer surgery. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(17): 57-60.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2019/V26/I17/57

[1]	王群，蒋伟.腔镜食管癌根治术在食管癌治疗中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2011，14（9）：683-685.
[2]	Biere SS，Van Berge Henegouwen MI，Maas KW，et al.Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer：a multicentre，open-label，randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet，2012，379（9829）：1887-1892.
[3]	孙超，石维平，吕小夏，等.三切口食管癌切除术：胸腔镜与开放手术的术后并发症分析[J].中华腔镜外科杂志（电子版），2016，9（6）：354-357.
[4]	陈辉，邓瑞文，李睿.胸、腹腔镜下食管癌根治术与传统开放手术的疗效比较分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志，2017，22（6）：408-412.
[5]	车忠玉，沙小伟，周伟光，等.胸腹腔镜联合行食管癌切除临床分析[J].中国实用医药，2018，13（11）：41-43.
[6]	李浩然，徐华明，赵晓华，等.胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术与开放三切口手术临床效果对比[J].潍坊医学院学报，2018，40（1）：70-72.
[7]	王志远，王天宝，李奇，等.胸腹腔镜联合手术治疗食管癌的疗效及其并发症发生情况[J].实用中西医结合临床，2018，18（2）：87-89.
[8]	王希文，赵俊刚.36例胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术术后疗效分析[J].重庆医学，2017，46（1）：78-80，83.
[9]	马明泉，姜宏景，唐鹏，等.胸腔镜微创与开放食管癌根治术围手术期并发症和淋巴结清扫情况的回顾性比较[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志，2015，31（5）：260-263.
[10]	张仁泉，夏万里，于在城，等.镜下荷包缝合技术性胸腹腔镜联合食管癌切除胸内吻合[J].中华外科杂志，2013，51（10）：945-947.
[11]	Verhage R，Hazebroek EJ，Boone J，et al.Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer：a systematic review of the literature[J].Minerva Chir，2009，64（2）：135-146.
[12]	亓磊，田辉，李林，等.微创食管癌切除术后淋巴结转移规律及预后分析[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志（电子版），2018，11（2）：98-102.
[14]	何丹，刘翼，吴振华，等.胸腹腔镜与传统开放手术治疗食管癌的围手术期疗效对比[J].中国癌症杂志，2016，26（11）：932-938.
[13]	Luketich JD，Pennathur A，Awais O，et al.Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy：review of over 1000 patiects[J].Ann Surg，2012，256（1）：95-103.
[15]	Giugliano DN，Berger AC，Rosato EL，et al.Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer：approaches and outcomes[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg，2016，401（6）：747-756.