|
|
|
| Clinical effect of sphincter preservation surgery treating anal fistula |
| ZONG Yi CHEN Hua ZHOU Yan JIANG Yu-xin ZHENG Wei-qin PENG Fan-ping |
| Department of Anorectal,Fuyong People′s Hospital of Bao′an District in Shenzhen City,Guangdong Province,Shenzhen 518103,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of sphincter preservation surgery treating anal fistula.Methods Fifty patients with anal fistula admitted to Fuyong People′s Hospital of Bao′an District in Shenzhen City from January 2017 to July 2019 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into control group (25 cases) and study group(25 cases) according to the random grouping method.The control group was treated with one-time incision and threaddrawing,the study group adopted the surgical treatment method of preserving the sphincter to preserve the mucosa.The one-time cure rates,anal pain,anal edema scores after surgery,incidence of complications,surgical operation time and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.Results The one-time cure rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The postoperative anal pain score and marginal edema score of the study group were lower than those of the control group,the differences weretatistically significant (P<0.05),the total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group,and the operation time and postoperative hospital stay were shorter than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The implementation of the treatment plan of sphincter preserving sphincter in the treatment of anal fistula patients can effectively improve the quality of the operation and the treatment effect,alleviate the discomfort of the patients after surgery,reduce the incidence of postoperative complications,and optimize the surgical procedure,shorten the treatment and hospitalization time,which is worth promoting and applying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
郭佳，何伟，管甲生.改良经括约肌间瘘管结扎术治疗低位肛瘘的可行性研究[J].临床外科杂志，2017，25（8）：621-623.
|
| [2] |
Dave Shi EP.Perineal skin bridge and levator muscle preservation in neutral sagittal anorectoplasty （NSARP） for vestibular fistula[J].Pediatr Surg Int，2005，21（9）：711-714.
|
| [3] |
司中华，王业皇，刘飞，等.视频辅助瘘管刨削治疗高位复杂性肛瘘临床疗效分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2017，20（8）：949-950.
|
| [4] |
刘越军，李会晨，张海磊.减（低）压引流根治术治疗高位肛瘘的临床研究[J].河北医药，2017，39（9）：1355-1357.
|
| [5] |
赵乐，范学顺.耻骨直肠肌部分保留联合括约肌间开创引流治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床研究[J].中国临床医生杂志，2017，45（7）：85-87.
|
| [6] |
冯静娟，向锋，程健.括约肌间瘘管结扎术结合脱细胞异体真皮基质填塞治疗经括约肌肛瘘的疗效分析[J].中国现代医学杂志，2018，28（31）：84-87.
|
| [7] |
王峰，刘杰，刘绍富.两种MRI 脂序列诊断肛瘘内口的准确性比较[J].结直肠肛门外科，2019，25（1）：96-99.
|
| [8] |
尹璐，梁宏涛，姚一博.置管引流联合负压吸引治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床效果研究[J 结直肠肛门外科，2019，25（1）：23-28.
|
| [10] |
吕亮，肖毅华，张勇，等.视频辅助肛瘘治疗技术的疗效分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2018，17（9）：973-976.
|
| [9] |
Adegbola SO，Sahnan K，Pellino G，et al.Short-term efficacy and safety of three novel sphincter-sparing techniques for anal fistulae：a systematic review[J].Tech Coloproctol，2017，21（10）：775-782.
|
| [11] |
刘纪锋，姚健，王顺和，等.保留肛窦微创置管冲洗引流治疗肛周脓肿的可行性研究[J].西部医学，2017，29（7）：970-973.
|
| [12] |
胡奇能，李迁聚，戎放.拖线疗法与括约肌间瘘管结扎术治疗肛瘘的效果及对血清炎症因子的影响[J].中国药物与临床，2018，18（12）：16-18.
|
| [13] |
Sugrue J，Mantilla N，Abcarian A，et al.Sphincter-sparing anal fistula repair：Are we getting better?[J].Dis Colon Rectum，2017，60（10）：1071-1077.
|
| [14] |
高昆.黏膜皮瓣推进术与括约肌间瘘管结扎术治疗复杂肛瘘的临床疗效比较[J].贵 州医药，2018，42（4）：443-445.
|
| [15] |
Omar W，Alqasaby A，Abdelnaby M，et al.Drainage seton versus external anal sphinctersparing seton after rerouting of the fistula tract in the treatment of complex anal fistula：A randomized controlled trial[J].Dis Colon Rectum，2019，62（8）：980-987.
|
| [16] |
杨润清，芦红果，刘扬，等.探讨肛瘘的治疗中保留括约肌的临床疗效[J].饮食保健，2016，3（20）：175-176.
|
| [17] |
刘刚.保留括约肌手术治疗肛瘘的疗效分析[J].当代医学，2015，21（23）：37-38.
|
| [18] |
孙薛亮，王晓鹏，文科，等.括约肌间瘘管结扎术治疗复杂性肛瘘临床疗效分析[J].临床外科杂志，2015，23（9）：694-696.
|
|
|
|
