|
|
|
| Effect comparison of ultrasound-guided upper arm infusion port and thoracic infusion port in tumor chemotherapy patients |
| JIANG Wen-chuan1 JIANG Ya-lan2 LIANG Su-fang3 |
1.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Jiangmen Central Hospital,Guangdong Province,Jiangmen 529000,China;
2.Department of Neurosurgery,Jiangmen Central Hospital,Guangdong Province,Jiangmen 529000,China;
3.Department of Neurology,Jiangmen Central Hospital,Guangdong Province,Jiangmen 529000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect comparison of ultrasound-guided upper arm infusion port and thoracic infusion port in tumor chemotherapy patients.Methods A total of 100 tumor chemotherapy patients who needed to be implanted into the infusion port in Jiangmen Central Hospital from October 2018 to October 2019 were selected as the research subjects.They were divided into the control group (50 cases) and the observation group (50 cases) according to a random lottery method.The control group adopted a chest-type infusion port implantation treatment method,the observation group adopted an upper arm infusion port implantation treatment method.The total incidence of complications,postoperative comfort,the success rate of one needle placement,the incidence of vascular injury,and the rate of intraoperative hematoma formation of the two groups were compared.Results The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The comfort scores of the observation group at 1 day,1 week,and 1 month after surgery were lower than those of the control group,and the comfort scores of the two groups at 1 week and 1 month after operation were lower than those of the control group 1 day after operation,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The success rate of one-needle placement in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the incidence of vascular injury and intraoperative hematoma formation were lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided upper arm infusion port has high safety in cancer chemotherapy patients,and has high postoperative comfort,high success rate of one-needle placement,while has low incidence of vascular injury and intraoperative hematoma formation,clinical application value is high.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
王影新，刘飞，赵璇，等.乳腺癌化疗患者不同部位植入输液港的对比研究[J].中华护理杂志，2019，54（6）：917-921.
|
| [2] |
王华摄，陈永和，刘爱红，等.皮下置入式静脉输液港在胃肠肿瘤患者化疗中的并发症分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2017，20（12）：1393-1398.
|
| [3] |
仇晓霞，金光鑫，郭艳，等.肿瘤患者上臂植入输液港相关感染发生率及危险因素研究[J].上海交通大学学报（医学版），2019，39（10）：1183-1187.
|
| [4] |
刘春丽，孟爱凤，施如春，等.乳腺癌患者上臂输液港植入方式改进[J].护理学杂志，2019，34（15）：47-49.
|
| [5] |
王玲，刘晓岭，郝璐，等.腔内心电图定位在乳腺癌化疗病人上臂植入式输液港中的应用[J].临床外科杂志，2017，25（12）：936-938.
|
| [6] |
仇晓霞，金光鑫，郭艳，等.肿瘤患者上臂植入输液港并发上肢静脉血栓发生率及危险因素[J].介入放射学杂志，2019，28（3）：242-246.
|
| [7] |
陈湘威，陈妙霞，林金香，等.恶性肿瘤病人上臂植入式输液港与PICC 的效果比较[J].全科护理，2019，17（33）：4109-4113.
|
| [8] |
李蓉梅，袁玲，孔炜伟，等.血管超声引导下植入手臂输液港的护理[J].护士进修杂志，2017，32（17）：1628-1630.
|
| [9] |
柴建中.上消化道出血患者经胃镜下喷洒凝血酶治疗的效果与安全性[J].临床医学研究与实践，2018，3（5）：111-112.
|
| [10] |
刘美，王芳芳，黄钦，等.不同植入部位的静脉输液港在肿瘤患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究，2016，13（21）：68-69.
|
| [11] |
葛若娣，吴银华，高瑛，等.鼻咽癌伴失明患者行上臂输液港植入1例护理体会[J].基层医学论坛，2019，23（24）：3547-3549.
|
| [12] |
郭敏，康丽君，陈雪梅，等.上臂植入式输液港与上臂PICC 应用效果比较[J].护理实践与研究，2016，13（11）：125-127.
|
| [13] |
汪丽钰，施丽华，朱凡，等.34例肿瘤患者上臂完全植入式静脉输液港应用体会[J].中华临床营养杂志，2019，27（1）：57-61.
|
| [14] |
胡丽娟，崔璀，吴钢，等.不同方式腔内心电图定位技术在经上臂静脉植入输液港中的应用研究[J].中华护理杂志，2019，54（3）：443-446.
|
| [15] |
张文静，颜欣，田红梅，等.上臂式静脉输液港与胸壁式静脉输液港比较[J].中国卫生标准管理，2020，11（6）：146-148.
|
|
|
|
