Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical effect of plasmakinetic resection for prostate (PKRP)and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods 100 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients in our hospital from January to December in 2016 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the study group,with 50 cases in each group.The control group was treated with TURP,and the study group was treated with PKRP.The intraoperative bleeding volume,operation time,bladder irrigation time,indwelling catheter time,hospitalization time,international prostate symptom score,quality of life score,maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax)and the incidence of complications in the two groups were compared.Results The intraoperative blood loss in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group,and the operation time,bladder irrigation time,catheter indwelling time and hospitalization time in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,with significant difference(P＜0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group was 14.00%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(44.00%),with significant difference(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the international prostate symptom score,quality of life score and Qmax(P＞0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of PKRP and TURP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is basically similar,but PKRP treatment is less damage to patients,recovery rate is faster,and the incidence of complications is low.
徐伟杰;李文欢. 经尿道前列腺双极等离子电切术和前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的效果对比[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(28): 86-88.
XU Wei-jie;LI Wen-huan. Comparison of the efficacy of PKRP and TURP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(28): 86-88.
京公网安备 11010502046607号