Abstract：Objective To compare the application effect of body surface marker localization and ultrasound guided localization in anesthesia for cesarean section parturients.Methods A total of 92 parturients with cesarean section treated in our hospital from August 2016 to August 2017 were selected as the subjects,and they were divided into the study group and control group according to their hospitalization order,there were 46 cases in each group.The control group was given body surface marker localization,while the study group was given ultrasound-guided localization,the anesthesia indexes and the incidence of complications of the two groups were observed.Results The positioning time before anesthesia in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group,the success rate of the first puncture in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group,and the differences were statistical significant(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the rate of converting to epidural anesthesia between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of various complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group respectively(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with body surface marker localization,ultrasound-guided localization is better in anesthesia for cesarean section parturients,although its positioning time before anesthesia is longer than that of body surface marker localization,but it can effectively promote the success rate of first puncture and effectively reduce the complications related to anesthesia.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
京公网安备 11010502046607号