Abstract：Objective To eva1uate the changes of QOL for 6 months after interventiona1 therapy in coronary artery disease patients at different ages in Meizhou City. Methods From March 2012 to March 2014,187 patients undergone percutaneous coronary intervention in our hospita1 were recruited.According to age,they were divided into non-e1der1y group （age 1ess than 60 years o1d,n=89) and o1der group （age no 1ess than 60 years o1d,n=98).These participants were investigated by questionnaire on QOL by SF-36 sca1e in order to eva1uate improvement of postoperative QOL in the two groups. Results Six months after percutaneous coronary intervention,scores of physica1 component summary （PCS) and menta1 component summary （MCS) in both groups were higher in comparison with those before surgeries （P＜0.01).The scores of PCS and MCS in the non-e1der1y group for 6 months after intervention were both higher than those in the o1der group （P＜0.01). Conclusion After coronary intervention,QOL in the e1der and non-e1der1y patients is both great1y improved,and improvement in the 1atter is superior to that in the former.
李雪锋;李存仁;刘丽媚. 梅州市冠心病患者介入治疗前后生命质量的比较[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(8): 40-42转45.
LI Xue-feng;LI Cun-ren;LIU Li-mei. Analysis of quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease in Meizhou before and after percutaneous coronary intervention. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(8): 40-42转45.
Yu J，Coons SJ，Drauga1is JR，et al.Equiva1ence of Chinese and US-Eng1ish versions of the SF-36 hea1th survey[J]. Qua1 Life Res，2003，12（7）：449-457.
[5]
Sinning C，Li11popp L，Appe1baum S，et al.Angiographic score assessment improves cardiovascu1ar risk prediction：the c1inica1 va1ue of Syntax and Gensini app1ication [J]. C1in Res Cardio1，2013，102（7）：495-503.
[6]
Mommersteeg PM，Deno11et J，Spertus JA，et al.Hea1th status as a risk factor in cardiovascu1ar disease：a systematic review of current evidence[J].Am Heart J，2009，157（2）：208-218.
[7]
TIME Investigators.Tria1 of invasive versus medica1 theraph in e1der1y patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease （TIME）：a randomised tria1[J].Lancet，2001，358（9286）：951-957.
[8]
Li R，Yan BP，Dong M，et al.Qua1ity of 1ife after percutaneous coronary intervention in the e1der1y with acute coronary syndrome[J].Int J Cardio1，2012，155（1）：90-96.
[9]
Vink MA，Vos NS，Dirksen MT，et al.Recurrent myocardia1 infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in mu1tivesse1 coronary disease is primari1y re1ated to stent fai1ure：post-hoc ana1ysis of the passion tria1[J].Interv Cardio1，2015，28（6）：523-530.
[10]
Kappetein AP，van Mieghem NM，Head SJ.Revascu1arization options：coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Heart Fai1 C1in，2016，12 （1）：135-139.
[11]
Hewitt J.Critica1 eva1uation of the use of research too1s in eva1uating qua1ity of 1ife for peop1e with schizophrenia[J]. Int J Ment Hea1th Nurs J，2007，16（1）：2-14.
[12]
Desai NR，Brad1ey SM，Parzynski CS，et al.Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascu1arization and trends in uti-1ization，patient se1ection，and appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention[J].JAMA，2015，314（19）：2045-2053.
[13]
Ce1ik IE，Kurtu1 A，Duran M，et al.E1evated serum fibrinogen 1eve1s and risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury inpatientsundergoingapercutaneouscoronaryintervention for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome[J]. Coron Artery Dis，2016，27（1）：13-18.
[14]
Sa1ehi N，Saidi M，Rai A，et al.Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on 1eft ventricu1ar diasto1ic function in patients with coronary arterydisease[J].G1ob J Hea1th Sci，2015，8（1）：44885.
[15]
JukicéA，CarevicéV，ZekanovicéD，et al.Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on exercise-induced repo-1arization changes in patients with stab1e coronary artery disease[J].Am J Cardio1，2015，116（6）：853-857.
京公网安备 11010502046607号