1.Department of Urinary Surgery,the Seventh People′s Hospital of Nanhai District of Foshan City in Guangdong Province,Foshan528247,China;
2.Department of Urinary Surgery,Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Foshan City in Guangdong Province,Foshan528200,China
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and open surgery in the treatment of ureteral calculi.Methods 51 patients with ureteral calculi who were given surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2011 to October 2016 were collected and screened.They were divided into the observation group(27 cases)and the control group(24 cases)according to the surgical procedures.The observation group was given retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy,and the control group was given open ureterolithotomy.The therapeutic effects of the two groups was compared.Results The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was less than that in the control group,the recovery time of gastrointestinal function,ambulation time,postoperative hospital stay in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group,with significant difference(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the indwelling time of drainage tube(P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of retroperitoneal laparoscope in the treatment of ureteral calculi is obvious,the trauma is small,and the postoperative recovery is fast,which is suitable for clinical promotion.
韦兴聪;韦巍;唐松林;何超雄;吴冠科;陈浩彬. 后腹腔镜与开放手术治疗输尿管结石的对比分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(7): 73-75.
WEI Xing-cong;WEI Wei;TANG Song-lin;HE Chao-xiong;WU Guan-ke;CHEN Hao-bin. Comparative analysis of retroperitoneal laparoscope and open surgery in the treatment of ureteral calculi. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(7): 73-75.