全程护理干预在异位妊娠患者围生期的应用效果

摘要
图/表
参考文献(15)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (29 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨全程护理干预在异位妊娠患者围术期的应用效果。方法选取2018年7月～2019年6月我院收治的60例异位妊娠患者作为研究对象，按照单双数分组方式分为观察组（n=30）与对照组（n=30）。对照组采用常规护理方式，观察组采用全程护理干预，比较两组汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）及汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）评分、生活质量综合评定问卷-74（GQOL-74）评分及对护理工作的满意度情况。结果观察组HAMD、HAMA评分低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组GQOL-74评分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；观察组的护理总满意度高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论对异位妊娠患者实施全程护理干预方式取得良好护理效果，可帮助患者调整心理状态，同时提高生活质量评分，维护护患间和谐关系，值得临床应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	马莉

关键词 ：全程护理, 异位妊娠, 围术期, 护理效果

Abstract：Objective To explore the application effect of perioperative nursing intervention in patients with ectopic pregnancy.Methods Sixty patients with ectopic pregnancy who were treated in our hospital from July 2018 to June 2019 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into the observation group (n=30) and the control group(n=30) according to the odd and even grouping method.The control group was used the conventional nursing mode, the observation group was used whole-course nursing intervention, Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) scores, comprehensive quality of life questionnaire-74 (GQOL-74) scores, and satisfaction with nursing work in the two groups were compared.Results The scores of HAMD and HAMA in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The score of the GQOL-74 scale in the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The total satisfaction of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The implementation of full-course nursing intervention for patients with ectopic pregnancy to achieve good nursing effect can help patients adjust their mental state, improve quality of life scores at the same time, and maintain a harmonious relationship between nurses and patients, worthy of clinical application

Key words： Full-course nursing Ectopic pregnancy Perioperative period Nursing effect

引用本文:

马莉. 全程护理干预在异位妊娠患者围生期的应用效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(23): 217-219.
MA Li. Application effect of perioperative nursing intervention on patients with ectopic pregnancy during perioperative period. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(23): 217-219.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2020/V27/I23/217

[1]	曾佳，李秀红，陈虹.全程护理干预对宫外孕围手术期患者的护理效果观察[J].当代医学，2019，24（26）：182-184.
[2]	周新红.护理干预对宫外孕围手术期患者心理状况的影响[J].中国医药指南，2018，16（18）：226-227.
[3]	蓝美菊.异位妊娠发生的相关危险因素分析[J].疑难病杂志，2012，11（12）：958-959.
[4]	黄文欢，尹月娥，贾玉娥.护理干预对宫外孕围手术期患者心理状况的影响研究[J].赣南药品评价，2016，36（2）：294-296.
[5]	张新敏.全程护理干预对宫外孕围术期患者的护理效果研究[J].河南医学研究，2017，26（21）：4024-4025.
[6]	谢幸，苟文丽.妇产科学[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2013.
[7]	Van MDB，Goddijn M，Ankum WM，et al.Early pregnancy care over time：should we promote an early preg-nancy assessment unit[J].Reprod Biomed Online，2015，31（2）：192-198.
[8]	林美玲．护理干预对宫外孕患者围术期心理状况的影响分析[J].社区医学杂志，2016，14（21）：82-83，86.
[9]	王立芹，任新萍.系统心理干预对宫外孕腹腔镜手术患者心理状态及术后恢复的影响[J].国际精神病学杂志，2017，44（4）：729-731.
[10]	Tambimuttu E，Lott A，Moore D.Successful diagnosis and laparoscopic management of haemorrhagic ovarian pregnancy with haemorrhagic contralateral corpus luteum[J].Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol，2015，55（2）：191-192.
[11]	庞敏.护理干预对宫外孕围术期患者心理状况的影响研究[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2016，3（7）：150-152.
[12]	杨淑梅，任晶，王星，等.92例宫外孕围术期患者实施全程护理干预的效果分析[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2019，6（12）：174-175.
[13]	唐秋霞.腹腔镜手术治疗宫外孕患者围术期护理干预效果分析[J].当代医学，2016，22（5）：106-107.
[15]	张桂芹，李玉霞，黄秀娟，等．宫外孕手术患者的术前心理状态分析及护理干预[J]．齐齐哈尔医学院学报，2008，29（7）：885-886．
[14]	Akaba GO，Ekele BA，Onafowokan O，et al.Compara-tive analysis of morbidity and mortality due to ectopic pregnancy at a tertiary care hospital in Nigeria over two study periods[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2015，128（1）：76-77.