Abstract：ObjectiveTo study the clinical effect of retroperitoneoscope combined with lower abdominal incision in the treatment of patients with renal pelvic cancer.Methods From January 2013 to January 2016,42 patients with renal pelvic cancer in our department were randomly divided into group A and group B,21 cases in each group.In group A,retroperitoneoscope combined with lower abdominal incision was used,while in group B,open radical resection for the renal pelvic carcinoma was performed.The surgical results and complications were compared between the two groups.After 1 year follow up visits,the recurrence and metastasis of tumors were observed in the two groups.Results The operations of the two groups were all successful.However,the intraoperative amount of bleeding,time of gastrointestinal recovery,and hospital stay were lower/shorter in group A compared with group B,with statistical differences(P＜0.01).There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications or tumor recurrence and metastasis rate between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Combination of retroperitoneoscope combined with lower abdominal incision has the advantages of small trauma,few complications,and little amount of bleeding.
孙爱军. 后腹腔镜联合下腹小切口治疗肾盂癌的临床效果分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(7): 81-83转86.
SUN Ai-jun. Clinical effect analysis of retroperitoneoscope combined with lower abdominal incision in the treatment of renal pelvic cancer. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(7): 81-83转86.
Lerut T，Nafteux P，Moons J，et al.Three-field lymphade nectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 RO resections：impact on staging， disease-free survival，and outcome ：a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma[J].Ann Surg，2004，240（6）：962-972.
京公网安备 11010502046607号