两种造影剂推注方法在不孕症患者子宫输卵管造影检查中的应用价值对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (34 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the difference in the value of two contrast agent injection methods in hysterosalpingography.Methods A total of 367 patients with infertility who were treated in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2017 were selected as the subjects,and divided into the control group(n=130)and observation group(n=247)according to the contrast injection method.In the control group,the physician manually injected the uterine tubal contrast agent at the bedside.The observation group used the remote technique to operate the microinjection pump to inject the uterine tubal contrast agent into the patient′s body.The image quality,diagnostic results,and pain status of the two groups were analyzed (VAS was used to assess the degree of pain).Results The image quality of the observation group(100.00%)was significantly higher than that of the control group(73.85%)(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the results of the fallopian tube angiography between the two groups(P>0.05),but the difference of the uterine angiography between the two group was statistically significant(P<0.01).The total pain of the infusion imaging in the observation group was 59 cases(23.89%),which was significantly lower than the control group for 107 cases(82.31%)(P<0.01).VAS scores in the observation group ([1.71±0.35]points)was significantly lower than that in the control group([6.45±1.12]points),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusion The use of remote technology to operate the microinjection pump to inject the contrast agent into the patient′s body can effectively protect the quality of the contrast image,reduce the patient′s pain and improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Key words： Contrast agent injection Uterine angiography Fallopian tube angiography Application value

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Xian
	BAO Jun-chu
	FANG Wu

Cite this article:

ZHANG Xian,BAO Jun-chu,FANG Wu. Comparison of the application value of two contrast agent injection methods in hysterosalpingography[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(22): 140-142.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I22/140

[1]	范丽.正性、负性造影剂联合经阴道实时三维子宫输卵管超声的临床应用研究[D].广州：南方医科大学，2015.
[2]	张金山，李龙.实验用高压注射泵在小儿门脉高压术中门脉造影中的应用[J].北京医学，2017，39（3）：311-312.
[3]	徐振华，刘胜，谢剑锋，等.离子型与非离子型造影剂在CT增强扫描中不良反应临床探讨[J].医药导报，2015，34（Z1）：184-185.
[4]	李蕊，王琦.经阴道实时三维超声造影评价输卵管通畅性的相关影响因素分析[J].浙江临床医学，2015，17（6）：999-1000.
[5]	牟洪勇，康立清，李风桥，等.微量注射泵远程自动推注造影剂在子宫输卵管造影检查中应用价值[J].中国医案，2017，18（4）：102-106.
[6]	周秋兰.实时三维子宫输卵管超声造影联合推注压力评估输卵管通畅性的研究[D].广州：广州医科大学，2016.
[7]	陈梅，张盛敏，薛念宇，等.子宫输卵管超声造影对输卵管通透性的诊断研究[J].中华医学超声杂志（电子版），2016，13（7）：531-537.
[8]	于丹丹，冷晓萍，李守强.手振生理盐水右心声学造影在卵圆孔未闭介入封堵术中的应用[J].中国循环杂志，2017，32（z1）：202.
[9]	苏红，吕开红，杨勇.超声造影诊断输卵管源性不育症的临床应用价值[J].临床超声医学杂志，2017，19（10）：679-681.
[10]	古淑芳，程琦，朱贤胜，等.低压推注造影剂在子宫输卵管超声造影中的应用[J].中国医学影像学杂志，2017，25（1）：34-36.
[11]	杨秉融，牟洪勇，郭贵有，等.布托啡诺复合依托咪酯在子宫输卵管造影剂术中的麻醉效果及安全性[J].中国医案，2017，18（5）：109-112.
[12]	苗杰，孟颖，刘明明，等.无痛性子宫输卵管造影对输卵管性不孕的诊断价值[J].中国医学装备，2017，14（10）：47-50.
[13]	钟渝，孙丹宁，区文才，等.不同峰值负压脉冲超声联合微泡对脾创伤止血的作用研究[J].西南国方医药，2016，26（12）：1422-1425.
[14]	许浩军，于宗良，朱建中，等.经脑动脉行冠脉造影及介入中上肢径路异常时PTCA导丝中的应用价值[J].中国心血管病研究，2016，14（8）：703-705.
[15]	唐晓旭.微泡造影剂增效HIFU治疗子宫肌瘤的临床研究[D].重庆：重庆医科大学，2015.