|
|
Value analysis of patient-controlled analgesia by combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia |
HOU Heng-sheng1 WANG Wen-min2 LIU Yue-mei3 |
1.Department of Internal Medicine,Nanlang Hospital of Zhongshan City,Guangdong Province,Zhongshan 528451,China;
2.Department of Anesthesiology,Nanlang Hospitall of Zhongshan City,Guangdong Province,Zhongshan 528451,China;
3.Room of Medical Records,Zhongshan Nanlang Hospitall of Zhongshan City,Guangdong Province,Zhongshan 528451,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical value of patient-controlled analgesia by combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia.Methods From June to September 2017,80 cases of primipara with single infant and head delivery who were admitted to our hospital were selected as the subjects,and divided into the control group and analgesia group by random number table method,40 cases in each group.The control group was given routine treatment,without analgesic treatment.In the analgesia group,when cervix was open to 2 cm,epidural puncture was carried out at L3-4intervertebral space,and then subarachnoid puncture was carried out by placing lumbar puncture needle.One mg Bupivacaine was injected if successful.PCEA then injected with a mixture of 0.1%Ropivacaine and 2 μg/ml Ffentanyl.The analgesic effect,labor duration,mode of delivery,oxytocin use rate and neonatal scoring were observed in the two groups.Results The VAS scores in the analgesia group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 5 min,40 min,70 min and 100 min respectively,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The duration of active period was shorter and the second stage of labor in the analgesia group was longer than those in the control group,all within the normal time range,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the third stage of labor(P>0.05).The use rate of oxytocin in the analgesia group was significantly higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the mode of delivery between the two groups(P>0.05).Neonatal score between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor analgesia has an exact effect,which significantly reduces the VAS pain score of each stage of labor in puerpera,shortens the time of active period,extends the second stage of labor,has no impact on the third stage of labor,increases the use rate of oxytocin,it has no impact on the mode of delivery and neonatal score,which has a high clinical application value.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
范建辉,朱娟,李萍,等.蛛网膜下腔阻滞加硬膜外阻滞镇痛对产程、分娩方式及母儿预后的影响[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(11):6-8.
|
[2] |
汤镇江,黄霓,舒家骏.CSEA联合PCEA下使用罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼或芬太尼用于分娩镇痛的效果比较[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(19):124-126.
|
[3] |
李友安,冶省娟,李学敏,等.腰麻联合自控硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛对产程及分娩方式的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(6):669-672.
|
[4] |
张少卿.舒芬太尼与芬太尼硬膜外自控镇痛对分娩镇痛效果、对产程及副作用的影响研究[J].北方药学,2016,13(5):91-92.
|
[5] |
王黎黎,王芬,柯善高,等.腰硬联合镇痛及患者自控镇痛对产程及分娩结局的影响[J].安徽医学,2016,37(3):314-317.
|
[6] |
刘纳新,黄杏琼,江金环,等.不同方式腰硬联合麻醉剖宫产患者术后自控镇痛效应的比较[J].广东医学,2015,36(5):712-714.
|
[7] |
叶辉,任秋生.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼硬膜外阻滞与腰硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛疗效及安全性比较[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(27):57-59,63.
|
[8] |
王大伟,王保国,侯燕.罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼腰-硬联合和硬膜外阻滞产程潜伏期分娩镇痛的效果比较[J].中国医刊,2014,49(8):95-98.
|
[9] |
张丽,谢荷英,夏若林.芬太尼加罗派卡因腰-硬联合麻醉阻滞用于产程潜伏期的观察[J].实用临床医学,2013,14(12):30-32.
|
[10] |
陆柳明.蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外腔联合麻醉加产妇自控硬膜外麻醉用于分娩镇痛的临床研究[D].南宁:广西医科大学,2013.
|
[11] |
杨斌,杨海云,朱孝中.瑞芬太尼静脉PCIA与腰硬联合PCEA在分娩镇痛中的比较[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(14):22-23.
|
[12] |
劳建新,宋兴荣,张永福.硬膜穿孔后硬膜外镇痛在分娩镇痛中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2012,28(5):448-450.
|
[13] |
范建辉,滕奔琦,李萍,等.蛛网膜下腔联合硬膜外腔阻滞用于分娩镇痛时机的探讨[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2011,32(5):628-632.
|
[14] |
张广民.罗哌卡因腰麻-硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛对产程和新生儿的影响[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2011,43(3):278-280.
|
[15] |
彭伟,况敏良.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉对产妇分娩潜伏期镇痛的临床应用效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(35):113-115.
|
|
|
|