|
|
Clinical effect com parision of combined and doublem irror and totally laparoscope for gallbladder-protected lithotom y treating gallbladder stone |
WU Hua-fei HE Hai-qing |
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,the Fourth People′s Hospital of Chenzhou City in Hunan Province,Chenzhou 42300,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the clinical effect of combined and doublemirror and totally laparoscope for gallbladder-protected lithotomy treating gallbladder stone.M ethods from January 2014 to August 2015,200 patients with gallbladder stone to our hospitalwere selected and they were divided into research group(n=100)and control group(n= 100)according to different surgical operation way.Research group was treated by laparoscope combined with choledochoscope while control group was treated by totally laparoscope for gallbladder-protected lithotomy.Operation time, blood loss,intestinal peristalsis recovery time and hospitalization days in two groupswas recorded,and the occurrence of postoperative complication was observed in patients.Results Operation time in research group was obviously shorter than that of control group,and blood losswas significantly less than that of control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),but two groups of intestinal peristalsis recovery time and hospitalization days had no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).After 12months,gallbladder wall thickness in research group was obviously smaller that of control group,while the gallbladder contraction function was obviously better that of control group,and there was a statistical difference(P<0.05).The incidence of complication was 4%in research group,while it was 8%in control group,and there was a statistical difference(P<0.05).After followed up for 6-12months,all patients recovered well and no recurrence cases.Conclusion The clinical effect of combined and doublemirror is good,fewer complications,and beneficial to maintain the integrity of the gallbladder and improve the function of the gallbladder.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李驰,吴刚.双镜联合与完全腹腔镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的效果比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(2):390-391.
|
[2] |
韩广山,董海霞.腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术同期治疗胆囊结石与胆总管结石的临床体会[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2014,19(2):125-127.
|
[3] |
霍登超,谢振堂,安郁利.双镜联合保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效对比分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(67):12-13.
|
[4] |
王彬,黄强.双镜联合保胆取石与胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效及安全性比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(9):936-939.
|
[5] |
王瑞浜.双镜联合保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石临床疗效观察[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2015,18(10):796-798.
|
[6] |
鄂森.双镜联合保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果[J].吉林医学,2013,34(12):2224.
|
[7] |
杨一唯,鲁斌.微创双镜联合保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床疗效比较研究[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(1):153-155.
|
[8] |
龚福祥,张迪平.双镜联合微创保胆取石手术78例临床分析[J]中外医学研究,2015,13(24):112-113.
|
[9] |
蒋晨霞,杨艳超,冯春,等.双镜联合微创保胆取石取息肉术手术配合体会[J]河北医药,2014,36(17):2713-2715.
|
[10] |
王玉祥,李应红,许兴,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜保胆取石术的临床体会(附15例报告)[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015,20(3):219-222.
|
[11] |
Jain K,Mohapatra T,Das P,et al.Sequential occurrence of preneoplastic lesions and accumulation of loss of heterozygosity in patients with gallbladder stones suggest causal association with gallbladder cancer[J].Ann Surg,2014,260(6):1073-1080.[12]Guo T,Yang L,Liu Y,et al.Risk factors of cholecystitis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J].Zhonghua Wei ChangWai Ke Za Zhi,2016,19(4):406-408.
|
[13] |
Jedlickova H,Dur anskáV,Vašk V.Paraneoplastic scleroderma:are there any clues?[J].Acta Dermatovenerol Croat,2016,24(1):78-80.
|
[14] |
Lamberts MP,Kievit W,Gerritsen JJ,et al.Episodic abdominal pain characteristics are not associated with clinically relevant improvement of health status after cholecystectomy[J].JGastrointest Surg,2016,20(7):1350-1358.
|
[15] |
Seifarth FG,Ramirez JR,Magnuson DK.Hybrid single-port cholecystectomy in children[J].JSLS,2013,16(3):401-405.
|
[16] |
Liu Y,Ji B,Wang Y,et al.Hem-o-lok clip found in common bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration:a clinical analysis of 8 cases[J].Int JMed Sci,2012,9(3):225-227.
|
[17] |
Völgyi Z,Fischer T,Szenes M,et al.A new type of rendezvous:introduction of laparo-endoscopy in selected patients[J].ZGastroenterol,2012,50(4):386-392.
|
|
|
|