|
|
Diagnostic value of combined detection of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer |
SUN Hui1 ZHU Li-jing1 WANG Zheng-qian |
1.Department of Clinical Laboratory,Lianshui People′s Hospital Affiliated to Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu Province,Lianshui 223400,China;
2.MRI Room,Lianshui People′s Hospital Affiliated to Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu Province,Lianshui 223400,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of several serum tumor markers in patients with gastric cancer by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Methods A total of 57 patients with gastric cancer (group A),50 patients with benign gastric lesions (group B) and 50 healthy patients with normal gastric mucosa (group C) from January 2016 to December 2017 in our hospital were selected as the research objects.Expression levels of carcino embryonic antigen (CEA),carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4),carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50),carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242) in serum for the three groups were detected by electrochemiluminescence.ROC curve was carried for analysis. Results The expression levels of CEA,CA72-4,CA50,CA19-9 and CA242 in group A patients were higher than those in group B and group C,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).With the progress of gastric cancer staging,the positive detection rate of CEA,CA72-4,CA50,CA19-9 and CA242 in the serum of gastric cancer patients showed an increasing trend.When the tumor markers were detected individually,the AUC of CA19-9 was 0.777,and the sensitivity of CA72-4 was the highest,which was up to 77.7%.The diagnostic accuracy of combined detection of tumor markers was improved.The AUC of the combined detection of CA50,CA72-4,CA19-9 and CA242 was 0.925,and the sensitivity increased to 78.7%. Conclusion The combined detection of CA50,CA72-4,CA19-9 and CA242 can effectively improve the accuracy and sensitivity of diagnosis of gastric cancer patients,and has important clinical diagnosis and application value.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
陈罗飞,马焌峰,樊勇,等.腹腔镜下胃癌根治术的现状与进展[J].中国肿瘤,2018,27(2):136-141.
|
[2] |
薛雯娟,康艳.肿瘤标志物在胃癌早期诊断中的应用价值[J].实用癌症杂志,2016,31(3):393-395.
|
[3] |
李果,廖建,周峰.胃癌患者应用CA724、CEA、CA199 肿瘤标志物联合检验的应用分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2018,15(4):208-210.
|
[4] |
中华人民共和国卫生部.中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1990.
|
[5] |
权继传,解亦斌,田艳涛.国际抗癌联盟胃癌TNM 分期系统第七版解读[J].中华诊断学电子杂志,2014,2(1):72-74.
|
[6] |
梁寒.国际胃癌新分期对我国临床应用的指导意义[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2013,16(2):111-113.
|
[7] |
叶冬青.医学科研方法与临床流行病学[M].合肥:安徽大学出版社,2003:279-288.
|
[8] |
Lin JX,Wang W,Lin JP,et al.Preoperative Tumor Markers Independently Predict Survival in Stage ⅢGastric Cancer Patients:Should We Include Tumor Markers in AJCC Staging?[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2018,25(9):2703-2712.
|
[9] |
李岩.胃癌肿瘤标志物及临床意义[J].实用医院临床杂志,2011,8(1):11-14.
|
[10] |
马拥军,王利霞.胃癌患者血清中多项肿瘤标志物的表达与病理学联合检查的意义[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2015,25(2):207-209.
|
[11] |
Ghaderi B,Moghbel H,Daneshkhah N,et al.Clinical Evaluation of Serum Tumor Markers in the Diagnosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Staging and Grading[J].J Gastrointest Cancer,2019,50(3):525-529.
|
[12] |
刘琳,张养民.血清多种肿瘤标志物联合检测对结直肠癌的诊断价值[J].实用癌症杂志.2016,31(6):976-978,982.
|
[13] |
沈萍萍,蒋素敏,吴益群,等.血清CEA、CA199 及SLPI联合检测在胃癌诊断中的价值[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(22):13-16.
|
[14] |
郭浩,关晓辉.胃泌素17 与CA7-24 联合检测在胃癌诊断中的价值[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版),2019,20(6):775-777.
|
[15] |
陈兆武,邓芳,张扬,等.应用ROC 曲线评价4 种血清肿瘤标志物对胃癌的诊断价值[J].临床输血与检验,2016,18(6):576-580.
|
|
|
|