|
|
|
| Clinical effect of inserting balloon+ring+anti-adhesion membrane after transcervial resection of intrauterine adhesion |
| XIAO Qian |
| Department of Gynecology,Women and Children′s Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University,Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Fujian Province,Xiamen 361000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of inserting balloon+ring+anti-adhesion membrane after transcervial resection of intrauterine adhesion.Methods A total of 50 cases of patients with intrauterine adhesion admitted to our hospital from January to December 2018 were selected as the study objects,and they were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 25 cases in each group.Both groups were treated with transcervial resection of intrauterine adhesion,the control group was treated with postoperative intrauterine balloon implantation,and the observation group was treated with inserting balloon+ring+anti-adhesion membrane.The clinical efficacy and uterine cavity morphology of the two groups were compared,the menstrual volume,increased menstrual volume,less menstrual volume and amenorrhea rate were counted,and the occurrence of adverse reactions of the two groups were recorded.Results The total effective rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The normal rate of uterine cavity morphology in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,the basic normal rate and the rate of re-adhesion were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05).The observation group had more menstrual volume than the control group,the increased rate of menstrual volume was higher than the control group,the less menstrual volume and amenorrhea rate were lower than the control group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).No adverse reactions such as infection,fever,uterine perforation,and incarcerated IUD were found in the two groups.Conclusion In the treatment of intrauterine adhesion of inserting balloon+ring+anti-adhesion membrane after transcervial resection of intrauterine adhesion can effectively improve the surgical effect,restore the uterine cavity shape,reduce the rate of re-adhesion,improve the menstrual situation,and has a higher safety,with positive clinical significance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
赵文娟，陈英，卢艳梅.宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术联合Interceed 治疗宫腔粘连效果研究[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（2）：393-396.
|
| [2] |
陈杰，王蔓茹.宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后宫IUD、球囊支架及Interceed 防粘连膜预防再粘连的疗效对比观察[J].吉林医学，2017，38（11）：2070-2071.
|
| [3] |
巴音吉力，陈勍，黄妙玲，等.宫腔粘连分离术后预防再粘连方法的疗效比较[J].岭南急诊医学杂志，2014，19（6）：462-464.
|
| [4] |
中华医学会妇产科分会妇科内镜学组.妇科宫腔镜诊治规范[J].中华妇产科杂志，2012，47（7）：555-558.
|
| [5] |
王飞.宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术治疗68例宫腔粘连疗效评价[J].中国实用医药，2018，13（14）：81-82.
|
| [6] |
易灵，崔艳萍，胡庆兰.术后放置防粘连膜加宫内节育器和几丁糖加球囊治疗重度宫腔粘连的疗效比较[J].国际生殖健康计划生育杂志，2017，36（1）：22-25.
|
| [7] |
王晓婉，边爱平，赵倩，等.中重度宫腔粘连术后应用防粘连膜的疗效分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科，2016，8（6）：61-65.
|
| [8] |
王楠.宫内节育器、球囊支架与Interceed 防粘连膜预防重度宫腔粘连宫腔镜分离术后再粘连的效果比较[J].四川解剖学杂志，2018，26（3）：23-25.
|
| [9] |
王爱香.宫腔镜下宫腔粘连电切术后再粘连的预防及疗效观察[J].中国妇幼保健，2012，27（27）：4299-4301.
|
| [10] |
邱瑜，黄建平，张小芳.宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后再粘连的预防及疗效观察[J].中国医学创新，2014，11（24）：61-63.
|
| [11] |
姚秀华，刘剀，都红蕾，等.放置防粘连膜或注水球囊预防重度宫腔粘连术后复发疗效研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2016，32（6）：541-544.
|
| [12] |
王润，欧红，阮艳.TCRA 术后Foley 球囊+自交联透明质酸钠凝胶在宫腔粘连患者中的应用效果[J].中国现代手术学杂志，2018，22（1）：73-77.
|
| [13] |
王滟，梅立，谢兰，等.可吸收防粘连膜及宫腔支撑球囊联合应用在中重度宫腔粘连术后的治疗效果观察[J].实用医院临床杂志，2018，15（2）：142-144.
|
| [14] |
李娜，陈贵芹，史素娥，等.不同方式预防宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后宫腔再粘连的效果分析[J].中国实用医刊，2018，45（7）：17-20.
|
| [15] |
李萍，何莎.宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术后预防再粘连方法的比较[J].现代仪器与医疗，2018，24（6）：94-95.
|
|
|
|
