|
|
Simultaneous fistula excision combined with loose thread operation in the treatment of complex anal fistula with perianal abscess |
LI Ming-yong1 XIE Peng1 HUANG Cai-mei2 DENG Guo-jun |
1. Department of General Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Nankang, Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341400, China;
2. Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Room, Ganzhou Nankang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiangxi Province,Ganzhou 341400, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of concurrent fistula external resection combined with loose thread operation in the treatment of complex anal fistula complicated with perianal abscess. Methods A total of 90 patients with complex anal fistulas and perianal abscesses admitted to the First People′s Hospital of Nankang from February 2018 to February 2020 were selected as the research objects, and were divided into a control group (45 cases)and an experimental group (45 cases)according to the odd and even number method.The control group was treated with staging fistula external resection combined with loose thread surgery, while the experimental group was treated with fistula external resection combined with loose thread surgery. The clinical operative indicators, postoperative complications and treatment effects of the two groups were compared. Results The wound healing time, operation time and hospitalization time of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical total effective rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Simultaneous and staged fistula external resection combined with loose thread surgery has better results and higher safety in the treatment of complex anal fistulas with perianal abscesses. However, the concurrent surgical plan takes shorter time, faster postoperative recovery, which can be further promoted and applied in clinical practice.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
郑力,陆金燕,浦玉伟,等.视频辅助肛瘘治疗术与传统切开挂线术治疗复杂性肛瘘临床疗效的比较研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(7):793-797.
|
[2] |
陈少全,张再重,林立英,等.新型冲吸治疗与负压封闭引流在高位肛周脓肿治疗中的临床疗效对比[J].中华实验外科杂志,2018,35(7):1335-1337.
|
[3] |
张梦慈,乔立超,祝新,等.MRI 检查在英夫利昔单克隆抗体联合挂线治疗克罗恩病肛瘘疗效评估中的应用价值及深度愈合影响因素分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2019,18(3):279-284.
|
[4] |
许国辉.瘘管旷置术联合传统切开挂线疗法对高位复杂性肛瘘患者术后切口愈合及复发率的影响[J].首都食品与医药,2018,25(14):34.
|
[5] |
朱慧婷,王业皇.切开挂线对口引流术对高位复杂性肛瘘患者术后肛门括约肌功能及生活质量的影响[J].中国社区医师,2018,34(20):73-74.
|
[6] |
徐帆.括约肌间瘘管结扎术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的疗效分析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2019,31(6):434-437.
|
[7] |
牟洁霏.联用传统切开挂线疗法和瘘管旷置术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的效果研讨[J].当代医药论丛,2019,17(3):28-29.
|
[8] |
王伟涛.虚挂线联合置管引流术对高位肛瘘患者肛门功能及并发症的影响[J].实用医药杂志,2018,35(12):37-39.
|
[9] |
竺平,谷云飞,杨柏霖,等.肛周瘘管性克罗恩病应用手术联合英夫利昔单抗治疗后再次手术的风险因素研究[J].结直肠肛门外科,2019,25(1):24-28,33.
|
[10] |
田晓庆,李迎春.对比分期、同期行瘘管外切+松挂线手术治疗复杂性肛瘘合并肛周脓肿的临床治疗效果[J].中西医结合心血管病杂志,2019,7(17):48-49.
|
[11] |
周红方.瘘管旷置术联合传统切开挂线疗法对高位复杂性肛瘘患者术后切口愈合及复发率的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2019,4(19):77-78.
|
[12] |
姚海东,华晓红,高妮娜,等.对比分期、同期行瘘管外切+松挂线手术治疗复杂性肛瘘合并肛周脓肿的临床治疗效果[J].糖尿病天地,2019,16(5):117.
|
[13] |
张建业.挂线术联合瘘管部分切开术治疗肛周脓肿并肛瘘患者的临床效果分析[J].中国保健营养,2018,28(23):244-245.
|
[14] |
陈伟,覃麟.挂实线术联合瘘管部分切开术治疗肛周脓肿并肛瘘患者的临床观察[J]. 结直肠肛门外科,2017,1(23):67-71.
|
[15] |
余成栋.切开引流加内口挂线术与内口直接切开术治疗肛周脓肿的效果观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(4):393-396.
|
[16] |
李金华,李文春,陈革.两种瘘管外切+松挂线手术治疗复杂性肛瘘合并肛周脓肿的临床对比研究[J].中国基层医药,2018,25(18):2394-2396.
|
|
|
|