|
|
Effect of radical incision and drainage in the treatment of perianal abscess |
LI Ming-yong1 XIE Peng1 HUANG Cai-mei2 DENG Guo-jun1 |
1.Department of General Surgery, the First People′s Hospital of Nankang District in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province,Ganzhou 341400, China;
2.Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Room, Nankang Maternity and Child Health Hospital of Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou 341400, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of radical incision and drainage in the treatment of perianal abscess and the prognosis and rehabilitation.Methods From January 2017 to June 2020, 90 patients with perianal abscess admitted to the First People′s Hospital of Nankang District in Ganzhou City were selected.According to the principle of voluntary allocation, 45 patients in the control group received simple incision and drainage, and 45 patients in the study group received radical incision and drainage.The treatment effect, prognostic rehabilitation indexes, incidence of complications and recurrence of the two groups were compared.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the study group (95.56%) was higher than that in the control group (80.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=11.286, P<0.05).The postoperative infection control time and hospital stay of the study group were shorter than those of the control group, and the postoperative pain score was lower than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate in the study group were 4.44% and 4.44%, respectively, which were lower than 20.00% and 24.44% in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (χ2=11.286, 16.188, P<0.05).Conclusion The radical incision and drainage treatment program for patients with perianal abscess has a significant effect and good prognostic rehabilitation indicators, which is beneficial to the early recovery of the patients′ condition and is worthy of promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
余成栋.切开引流加内口挂线术与内口直接切开术治疗肛周脓肿的效果观察[J].结直肠肛门外科,2018,24(4):393-396.
|
[2] |
朱小艳,周海东,景岚.一期根治术与切开引流术治疗高位多间隙肛周脓肿对照研究[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(3):321-323.
|
[3] |
张辉,王志民,高荣青,等.主灶切开加弧形开窗引流治疗复杂性肛周脓肿的临床研究[J].中国现代普通外科进展,2019,22(4):266-269.
|
[4] |
胡琦.一次性肛周脓肿根治术治疗肛周脓肿的效果分析[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2019,27(2):95-96.
|
[5] |
张义,蔡晓芸.一次性肛周脓肿根治术对患者肛周疼痛及肛门功能的影响分析[J].中国急救医学,2018,38(Z1):243.
|
[6] |
黄林.一次性手术切开引流挂线术治疗肛周脓肿的疗效和预后[J].黑龙江医药,2019,32(1):172-174.
|
[7] |
俞斌.一次性根治术治疗肛周脓肿的临床疗效分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2019,29(2):54-57.
|
[8] |
陈滟,王小峰,金黑鹰,等.三间隙引流术治疗肛周脓肿的可行性探讨[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2016,19(4):442-445.
|
[9] |
余莉萍.一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期治疗肛周脓肿效果对比[J].中外医疗,2018,37(16):75-77.
|
[10] |
徐坤.肛周脓肿应用根治性切开引流与单纯切开引流的临床疗效对比分析[J].湖北科技学院学报(医学版),2017,31(6):495-497.
|
[11] |
李学化,余智涛,陈快荣,等.脓肿切除根治术与单纯切开引流术治疗肛周脓肿的疗效比较[J].结直肠肛门外科,2017,23(2):204-208.
|
[12] |
黄方军,刘阳,潘敏,等.一次性切开根治术与传统切开引流术治疗肛周脓肿的疗效比较[J].安徽医学,2020,41(4):470-472.
|
[13] |
毛敏,钟华.肛周脓肿手术治疗的不同方式对患者疗效及生活质量的影响[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2018,37(5):2194-2199.
|
[14] |
王蕾.一期根治术对肛周脓肿患者术后肛门功能的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(2):201-203.
|
[15] |
付兆亮,白庚申,田世家,等.肛周脓肿切开根治术与单纯引流术的疗效比较[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2019,39(1):15-16.
|
[16] |
龚华成,彭迎迎,黄青,等.中药配合一次性根治术对肛周脓肿术后创面疼痛及炎症水平的影响[J].中国医学创新,2020,17(22):112-115.
|
[17] |
毛捷鸿,张磊.一次性肛周脓肿根治术治疗肛周脓肿的临床研究[J].中国现代医生,2020,58(6):45-47.
|
|
|
|