|
|
Effect comparison of Mifepristone and Tripraline in the treatment of uterine fibroid |
WANG Xiao-shuang |
Department of Gynaecology,Shenyang Women′s and Children′s Hospital,Liaoning Province,Shenyang 110001,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effect of Mifepristone and Tripraline in the treatment of uterine fibroid.Methods A total of 60 patients with uterine fibroid who treated in Department of Gynaecology in Shenyang Women′s and Children′s Hospital from January to June in 2019 were selected as the research objects and divided into the observation group and the control group by random number table method,with 30 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with Mifepristone and the control group was treated with Tripraline.The treatment effect,fibroid volume,serum hormone and hemoglobin level and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the fibroid volumes of the two groups were smaller than those before treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the fibroid volume of the observation group was smaller than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of estradiol(E2)and follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)in the two groups were lower than those before treatment,the level of hemoglobin was higher than that before treatment,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After treatment,the levels of E2 and FSH in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,the level of hemoglobin was higher than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total rate of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Mifepristone can significantly reduce the volume of uterine fibroids,reduce the levels of E2 and FSH,increase the level of hemoglobin,and the adverse reactions were less,with more significant clinical efficacy.
|
Received: 09 April 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
姜艳萍,张青冬,王楚平,等.桂枝茯苓胶囊联合不同剂量米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤临床观察[J].中国药业,2019,28(3):45-47.
|
[2] |
周隽,叶德华.腹腔镜下全子宫切除术与开腹手术应用于子宫肌瘤患者中的临床价值对比[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版),2016,13(4):116-118.
|
[3] |
牛琳达,徐艳芳,王超,等.孕激素拮抗药物联合子宫动脉栓塞术在子宫肌瘤患者中的临床疗效分析[J].肿瘤药学,2017,7(6):720-730.
|
[4] |
谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[J].第八版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:310-312.
|
[5] |
杨波,李宝秀.子宫肌瘤的临床诊治与护理探讨[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(48):112-113.
|
[6] |
王红源.醋酸曲普瑞林注射液联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤疗效分析[J].现代诊断与治疗,2018,29(5):721-722.
|
[7] |
田昕.不同剂量米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤效果比较[J].中国民康医学,2019,31(7):15-17.
|
[8] |
钟毅征,黄嘉华,潘美均,等.宫瘤清胶囊联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤有效性的Meta 分析[J].中国药房,2020,31(2):221-225.
|
[9] |
米祎.醋酸亮丙瑞林预处理联合腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗巨大子宫肌瘤临床观察[J].中国医药科学,2018,8(2):68-70.
|
[10] |
吕辉,张金婷.中药自拟方联合米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效观察及对性激素水平的影响[J].中国基层医药,2017,24(11):1670-1673.
|
[11] |
张丽丽,步仰高,高静,等.腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术与经阴道全子宫切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(11):2581-2584.
|
[12] |
古丽加娜提·毛吾列提,米合日尼沙·买买提,玛依努尔·尼牙孜.曲普瑞林在低危初治滋养细胞肿瘤化疗中对AMH、FSH 的短期调节作用观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2017,25(16):2644-2648.
|
[13] |
任聪,刘大胜,王凤,等.中医药治疗子宫肌瘤的研究进展及述评[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2019,25(1):141-144.
|
[14] |
刘艳华,张腾飞.米非司酮对子宫肌瘤治疗的安全性评价[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(48):112-113.
|
[15] |
Cuevas CA,Tapia-Pizarro A,Salvatierra AM,et al.Effect of single post-ovulatory administration of mifepristone(RU486)on transcript profile during the receptive period in human endometrium[J].Reproduction,2016,151(4):331-349.
|
[16] |
朱晓兰,李洁明.米非司酮联合宫瘤消胶囊对子宫肌瘤患者细胞因子和性激素水平影响研究[J].中国性科学,2016,25(4):56-59.
|
|
|
|