|
|
Value of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly |
ZHOU Yu XU Juan ZHOU Gang KANG Zhao-he XU Dan |
Department of Orthopaedics, Ji′an Hospital of Shanghai Oriental Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Ji′an 343000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the value of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNa) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly.Methods A total of 42 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected as the study subjects.They were divided into the observation group (n=21) and the control group (n=21) according to random sampling method.The control group was treated with dynamic hip screw (DHS), while the observation group was treated with PFNa.The clinical efficacy, surgical related indicators and the total incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume of the patients in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group, the operation time of the patients in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of treatment in the observation group was 95.24%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (66.67%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The fracture healing time, total weight-bearing time and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion PFNa can effectively improve the clinical effect and reduce the risk of adverse reactions in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture, which is worthy of clinical reference and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
赵学辉,张伟,蒋刚,等.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折围手术期隐性失血100例[J].江西中医药大学学报,2016,28(5):49-51.
|
[2] |
周君.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗股骨粗隆间骨折失败原因研究综述[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2017,25(9):80-82.
|
[3] |
蔡延禄,吴漾,林瑞忠,等.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的效果比较[J].广东医学,2015,36(24):3834-3836.
|
[4] |
沈阳,胡金龙.局部浸润镇痛对老年股骨粗隆间骨折行股骨近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉手术患者围术期疼痛的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(15):94-95.
|
[5] |
蓝国湖.PFNA 在老年股骨粗隆间骨折治疗中的应用分析[J].泰山医学院学报,2016,37(4):427-428.
|
[6] |
施战国,施建勋,王勇飞.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折效果比较[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(19):3535-3536.
|
[7] |
朱玉科,吴华夏.股骨近端锁定钢板和防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年性股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,19(19):96-98.
|
[8] |
王瑞林.动力髋螺钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗外侧壁危险型股骨粗隆间骨折的临床对比研究[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(2):282-284.
|
[9] |
高增峰.动力髋螺钉和股骨近端螺旋刀片抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的疗效[J].医疗装备,2016,29(15):130-131.
|
[10] |
胡书华,罗轶,冯晓冰,等.股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA 内固定远端2种锁定方法的生物力学研究[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(6):601-604.
|
[11] |
田玉良,李一鹏,于海泉,等.经皮微创锁定钢板与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2017,26(7):41-43.
|
[12] |
张鹏程.股骨近端抗螺旋髓内钉手术治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(35):76-77.
|
[13] |
邵锋,吴俊涛,张春旺.股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折疗效比较[J].新乡医学院学报,2018,35(2):122-124.
|
[14] |
王武,翟生,韩小平,等.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉对老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折疗效的对比研究[J].中华医学杂志,2018,98(5):357-361.
|
[15] |
石金柱,马学忠,王剑,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床预后分析[J].中国处方药,2018,16(11):160-161.
|
|
|
|