|
|
Report of "critical value" in laboratory department and observation on the therapeutic effect of clinical critical care |
LIANG Jian-fu1 ZHANG Chang-sen1 FENG Ji-shun2 DIAO Yu-lan1 |
1. Deprtment of Clinical Laboratory, People′s Hospital of Yangdong District in Yangjiang City, Guangdong Province,Yangjiang 529900, China;
2. Department of Surgery, People′s Hospital of Yangdong District in Yangjiang City, Guangdong Province, Yangjiang 529900, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of "critical value" report in deprtment of clinical laboratory in the treatment of clinical acute and critical diseases. Methods From May 1, 2015 to April 30, 2018, 2400 patients with clinical emergency and critical value were selected as study objects and they were divided into control group (1200 cases) and observation group (1200 cases) according to the visiting time. The patients in the control group were admitted when the "critical value" report in deprtment of clinical laboratory was not carried out from May 1, 2015 to October 31, 2016. While the patients in the observation group were admitted when the "critical value" report in deprtment of clinical laboratory in our hospital was carried out from November 1, 2016 to April 30, 2018. The awareness rate of "critical value" and the mastery rate of reporting process were compared in laboratory staff between the two groups. The clinical receiving time, disposal time, improvement time of critical value, return rate of "critical value", success rate of rescue and satisfaction degree of clinical departments were compared in patietns between the two groups. Results The awareness rate of "critical value" (100.0%) and the mastery rate of reporting process (100.0%) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (60.0% and 40.0%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The clinical receiving time, disposal time and improvement time of critical value in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the return rate of critical value (100.0%), success rate of rescue (92.3%)and satisfaction degree of clinical department (98.8%) in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (88.1%, 81.0%, 78.8%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The "critical value" reporting system can significantly improve the professional skills and professional literacy of laboratory staff, and improve the rescue efficiency and success rate of clinical critical patients. It has a higher degree of satisfaction in clinical departments and deserves to be popularized and applied.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
杨浩,付靖瑜,汪宏良,等.JCI 标准下检验危急值报告的实践与应用[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(16):2400-2402.
|
[2] |
臧宝华.危急值报告环节质量控制中存在的问题与对策[J].中国当代医药,2014,21(27):152-153,156.
|
[3] |
张梅,孙琦,许月琼,等.危急值报告流程在危重病患者护理质量控制中的应用[J].西部医学,2015,27(10):1586-1588.
|
[4] |
蔡晓红.质量控制在急诊危急值报告管理中的应用[J].上海护理,2017,17(1):84-85.
|
[5] |
邱胜丰,张美娟,夏晓红,,等.危急值报告制度的临床应用[J].江苏医药,2016,42(19):2157-2159.
|
[6] |
叶向阳,范火芹,蔡磊,,等.“危急值”报告制度在基层医院心内科中的应用[J].浙江医学教育,2014,13(2):20-21,12.
|
[7] |
周志男,张国军,白波,等.危急值电子报告系统的临床应用分析[J].国际检验医学杂志,2016,37(23):3274-3276.
|
[8] |
翁晓英.电解质危急值制度在社区医院中的建立与应用体会[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(19):80-81.
|
[9] |
杨志海.危急值短信报告系统的设计与实现[J].医疗卫生装备,2017,38(12):48-50,54.
|
[10] |
唐丽娟,彭红,潘晓娟,等.持续质量改进在危急值管理中的应用[J].中华医院管理杂志,2017,33(10):764-765.
|
[11] |
王桂梅,刘乃丰,史亚香,等.危急值全程信息化管理与持续改进[J].临床检验杂志,2015,33(8):630-632.
|
[12] |
胡瑜,周桓,任峰,等.医学检验危急值信息化管理平台的建立[J].中国医院管理,2016,36(2):51-52.
|
[13] |
临床检验危急值规范化管理京冀专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2016,39(3):154-160.
|
[14] |
刘月平,邓会岩,江锦平,等.病理科危急值及其临床应用[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2017,33(3):338-340.
|
[15] |
中华医学会检验医学分会临床实验室管理学组.医学检验危急值报告程序规范化专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2016,39(7):484-486.
|
|
|
|