|
|
Comparison of the effect of internal fixation with hollow nail and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture |
LI Zhong-hui WENG Yang-hua LAI Xiao-min |
Department of Orthopaedics,Humen Hospital of Dongguan City,Guangdong Province,Dongguan 523900,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effect of internal fixation with hollow nail and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture.Methods A total of 74 cases of femoral neck fracture treated in our orthopaedics department from June 2012 to June 2014 were selected and randomly divided into internal fixation group groups(n=37)and permutation group (n=37).The internal fixation group was treated by internal fixation with hollow screws,permutation group was treated with total hip replacement.The postoperative conditions,and postoperative follow up for 12 months Harris hip joint function and quality of life of two groups of patients were campared.Results The operation time in permutation group was longer than that of the internal fixation group(P<0.05),the intraoperative blood was more than that of internal fixation group(P<0.05).The bed time of the permutation group was significantly faster than that of the internal fixation group(P<0.05),fracture healing time was significantly faster than that of the internal fixation group(P<0.05),hospitalization time was significantly shorter than that in the internal fixation group(P<0.05),the postoperative complication rate was significantly lower than that in the internal fixation group(P<0.05).The permutation group excellent and good rate of hip joint function was significantly higher than that in the internal fixation group at 12 months after operation (P<0.05);The mental health,emotional function,life activity,physical pain,physical function,physical function,social function and overall health score of the permutation group were higher than those in the internal fixation group after 12 months,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Total hip replacement for treatment of femoral neck fracture is better than that of the hollow pin internal fixation,and it can improve the function and quality of life of the patients.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Jui-Jung Y,Leou-Chyr L,Kuo-Hua C,et al.Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013,95(1):61-69.
|
[2] |
雒萌,哈斯.人工股骨头置换术和全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J].中国医学工程,2013,12(9):28-29.
|
[3] |
袁堂波,黄立新,蒋建农,等.双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2013,8(6):485-488.
|
[4] |
区广鹏,肖军,郑佐勇,等.金属大头全髋关节置换术和半髋关节置换术治疗老年人股骨颈骨折的近期疗效比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,14(14):3292-3293.
|
[5] |
刘兴晖,谢正荣,卢回东,等.人工股骨头置换与内固定治疗老年性股骨颈骨折[J].中华全科医学,2013,11(3):430.
|
[6] |
Zhang NN,Ye ZM,Zhu YY,et al.Case-control study on double screws system and compressed three canulated screws in treating femoral neck fractures[J].Zhongguo Gu Shang,2013,26(7):565-571.
|
[7] |
Springer ER,Lachiewicz PF,Gilbert JA.Internal fixationg of femoral neck fractures:a comparative biomechanical study of Knowles pins and 6.5 mm cancellous[J].Clin Orthop,1991,(267):85-92.
|
[8] |
袁东堂,刘刚,于广泽,等.不同手术方法治疗老年股骨颈骨折的临床对比研究[J].重庆医学,2014,13(1):116-117.
|
[9] |
夏胜利,王秀会,付备刚,等.闭合复位3枚空心钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(4):325-327.
|
[10] |
席学义.全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].河南外科学杂志,2013,19(2):65-66.
|
[11] |
李龙.全髋置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效对比[J].河北医学,2013,11(4):498-500.
|
[12] |
冼敬锋.全髋关节置换术与骨折内固定术治疗中老年股骨颈骨折的疗效分析[J].重庆医学,2013,13(13):1528-1529.
|
[13] |
李世民,党耕町.临床骨科学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1998:196.
|
[14] |
任东.全髋关节置换术与空心钉内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效对比分析[J].中国医药科学,2014,4(6):206-208.
|
[15] |
滕家松.全髋置换术和空心钉内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国现代医生,2011,5(9):148-149.
|
|
|
|