硬通道微创穿刺碎吸术治疗高血压脑出血的临床研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy ofminimally invasive puncture and drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.MethodsFrom January to December in 2017,64 cases of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage were selected as the subjects,and divided into observation group and control group by random number tablemethod,32 cases in each group.The patients were treated with conservative treatment.The patients in the observation group were treated by hard channelminimally invasive puncture drainage,and the control group was treated by craniotomy hematoma evacuation.The clinical efficacy,hematoma clearance rate,preoperative and postoperative neurological deficit score and postoperative complication rate of the two groupswere compared.ResultsAfter treatment,the total clinical effective rate in the observation group was 90.63%,significantly higher than the control group for 71.88%,the differencewas statistically significant(P＜0.05).Postoperative hematoma clearance rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group　(P＜0.05).Postoperative neurological deficit score in the observation group of patientswas significantly lower than that in the control group　(P＜0.05).The postoperative complication rate of the observation group was 6.25%,significantly lower than the control group of 31.25%,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).ConclusionHard channelminimally invasive puncture and drainage is effective in treating hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage,with a thorough removal of hematoma,and can improve neurological function,reduce postoperative complication rate.Which isworth popularizing and applyingwidely.

Key words： Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage Hard channelminimally invasive puncture and drainage Neurological deficit score Complications

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Yuan-xin
	HUANG Peng
	ZUO Liang-cheng
	MING Qiang

Cite this article:

CHEN Yuan-xin,HUANG Peng,ZUO Liang-cheng, et al. Clinical study of hard channelm inimally invasive puncture and drainage in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(16): 69-71.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I16/69

[1]	管雪军.软、硬通道微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的效果和适应证分析[J].中外医学研究，2017，15（28）：154-155.
[2]	杨理媛，孙晓川.治疗高血压脑出血三种术式疗效和预后研究[J].中国全科医学，2012，15（9）：1040-1042.
[3]	李萍，赵树明，胡亚男，等.脑出血发病机制研究进展[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志，2015，17（2）：214-215.
[4]	薛敬明.微创硬通道技术治疗高血压脑出血 59例临床观察[J].中外医学研究，2018，15（15）：28-29.
[5]	道日娜，虞猛.软、硬通道微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果对比[J].中国医院药学杂志，2010，38（11）：190-198.
[6]	罗铸.硬通道微创穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者治疗效果颅内感染率及穿刺出血率的影响[J].河北医学，2017，23（2）：312-315.
[7]	贾向军，王威.软或硬通道微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床效果[J].医疗装备 2016 ，29（5）：10-11.
[8]	廖颂明，江焕新，沈伟俊，等.硬通道引流和软通道引流治疗老年高血压脑出血临床疗效对比研究[J].临床医学工程，2013，20（3）：294.
[9]	徐万所.软硬两种通道微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床观察[J].中外医学研究，2012，10（21）：34-35.
[10]	王勇，童凌云，张华暹，等.硬通道穿刺术与显微小骨窗治疗中等量高血压脑出血患者神经功能恢复的比较[J].浙江创伤外科，2013，18（5）：668-669.
[11]	凡奇.高血压脑出血微创硬通道引流疗效观察[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志，2016，19（18）：89-90.
[12]	廖颂明，江焕新，沈伟俊，等.硬通道引流和软通道引流治疗老年高血压脑出血临床疗效对比研究[J].临床医学工程，2013，20（3）：294-295.
[13]	李萍，赵树明，胡亚男，等.脑出血发病机制研究进展[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志，2015，17（2）：214-215.
[14]	王永东，孙桂良.基层医院神经内科对高血压脑出血定向硬、软通道技术临床救治体会[J].当代医学，2013，8（21）：33-34.
[15]	王广山.硬通道微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血对血肿清除率及神经功能改善的影响[J].中国实用医药，2017，12（24）：48-49.
[16]	罗铸.硬通道微创穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者治疗效果颅内感染率及穿刺出血率的影响[J].河北医学，2017，23（2）：312-313.