Abstract：Objective To investigate the selection of delivery mode and its influence on the outcome of post-cesarean section re-pregnancy.Methods Puerperas who were hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from February 2014 to October 2015 were selected:68 pregnant women of re-pregnancy vaginal delivery after cesarean section(group A),68 pregnant women of non-scar uterus vaginal delivery(group B),68 pregnant women of re-pregnancy elective cesarean section after cesarean section in the same period (group C).The delivery outcomes, complications of maternal and children between each group was analyzed and compared.Results The hospitalization time,postpartum hemorrhage volume,total stage of labor,delivery rate,rate of postpartum fever,rate of neonatal asphyxia in the group A and group B had no statistically significant difference(P＞0.05);the time of placental expulsion in the group C was less than that of the group A,the postpartum hemorrhage volume of the group C was more than that of group A,the hospitalization time of group C was longer than that of the group A,the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Under the premise of close monitoring of the labor stage and strict control of the indications of vaginal delivery,selection of the vaginal delivery for post-cesarean section re-pregnancy will not increase the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines.Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth.No.155.（Replaces guideline NO.147），February 2005[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet，2005，89（3）：319-331.
[14]
American C ollege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists．ACOG Practice bulletin NO.115：Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[J].Obstet Gynecol，2010，116（2 Pt 1）：450-463.
[15]
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists（2015）. Birth After Previous Caesarean birth（Green-top Guideline No.45[EB/OL].http://www.rcog.org.uk.（2015-10-01）[2016-06-28].
[20]
Jastrow N，Chaillet N，Roberge S，et al.Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect：a systematic review[J].J Am Obstet Gynaecol Can，2010，32（4）：321-327.
[21]
Guise JM，Denman MA，Emeis C，et al.Vaginal birth after caesarean：new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol，2010，115（6）：1267-1278.
京公网安备 11010502046607号