椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间隙感染的效果

摘要
图/表
参考文献(16)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的观察椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间隙感染的效果。方法选取2017 年1 月至2020 年1 月上饶市人民医院收治的56 例腰椎间隙感染患者作为研究对象，按照交替分组方法将其分为对照组（28 例）与实验组（28 例）。对照组采用传统开放手术治疗方法，实验组采用椎间孔镜技术治疗。观察两组患者的手术基本情况、住院时间、住院费用、疼痛度、感染指标、治疗总有效率。结果实验组患者的手术时间、住院时间短于对照组，术中出血量少于对照组，住院费用低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术前、术后3 d，两组患者的视觉模拟评分（VAS）评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后 3 d，两组患者的 VAS 评分均低于术前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。术前、术后 3 d，两组患者的红细胞沉降率（ESR）、C-反应蛋白（CRP）水平比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组患者术后3 d 的ESR、CRP 水平均低于术前，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组患者的治疗总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间隙感染的效果与开放术式相当，但其可明显缩短患者住院时间，减少医疗费用支出，减轻患者痛苦，具有创伤小、术后恢复快等特点。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：椎间孔镜技术, 抗生素, 腰椎间隙感染

Abstract：Objective To observe the effect of intervertebral foraminal technique in treating lumbar intervertebral space infection. Methods A total of 56 patients with lumbar intervertebral space infection admitted to Shangrao People′s Hospital from January 2017 to January 2020 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into a control group (28 cases) and an experimental group (28 cases) according to the alternate grouping method. The control group was treated with traditional open surgery, and the experimental group was treated with foraminoscopy. The basic operation situation, length of stay, hospitalization cost, pain, infection index and total effective rate were observed in the two groups. Results The operation time and hospitalization time of patients in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group was less than that in the control group, and the hospitalization cost in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, with statistical significances (P＜0.05). There were no significant differences in visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and 3 d after surgery between the two groups (P＞0.05). Three days after surgery, VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before surgery, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). There were no significant differences in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the two groups before and 3 d after surgery (P＞0.05). Three days after surgery, ESR and CRP levels in the two groups were lower than those before surgery,the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of foraminoscope technique in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral space infections is equivalent to that of open surgery, but it can significantly shorten the patients′ hospital stay, reduce medical expenses, and alleviate patients′ pain. It has the characteristics of less trauma and quicker recovery after surgery.

Key words： Intervertebral foraminal technique Antibiotics Lumbar intervertebral space infection

收稿日期: 2021-06-17

基金资助:江西省卫生计生委科技计划项目（20204794）

引用本文:

吴斌；王芳；邓贤超. 椎间孔镜技术治疗腰椎间隙感染的效果[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(35): 72-74转78.
WU Bin1 WANG Fang2 DENG Xian-chao1. Effect of intervertebral foraminal technique in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral space infection. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(35): 72-74转78.

链接本文:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/ 或 http://dangdaiyiyao.com/CN/Y2021/V28/I35/72

[1]	唐建华，赵丽丽，黄春明，等.椎间孔镜技术在腰椎间隙感染辅助治疗中的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志，2020，20（5）：446-450.
[2]	李海涛，刘新宇.经皮椎间孔镜技术在腰椎术后并发椎间隙感染的临床应用[J].颈腰痛杂志，2018，39（3）：21-23.
[3]	王春增，张兆川，赵猛，等.椎间孔镜下病灶清除冲洗治疗腰椎非特异性感染的疗效[J].实用骨科杂志，2018，24（1）：60-63.
[4]	唐建华，赵丽丽，黄春明，等.经皮椎间孔镜下病灶清除联合射频消融术治疗腰椎椎间隙感染疾病[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2019，34（9）：960-962.
[5]	张伟，陈旸，蒋刚，等.椎间孔镜下椎间病灶清除联合后路经皮椎弓根钉内固定治疗腰椎间隙感染患者的临床效果[J].医疗装备，2019，32（20）：103-104.
[6]	Kentaro H，Katsuhisa Y，Terufumi K，et al.18F-FDG-PET/CT localizes intervertebral disc space infection following posterior lumbar interbody fusi on surgery leading to successful retention of percutaneously inserted pedicle screws：a case report[J].Spinal Cord Ser Cases，2018，4（1）：81.
[7]	魏景超，李文毅，高尚聚，等.椎间孔镜下病灶清除联合臭氧消融治疗原发性腰椎间隙感染[J].颈腰痛杂志，2017，38（3）：227-230.
[8]	Abu-Leil S，Floman Y，Bronstein Y，et al.A morphometric analysis of all lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies in degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Eur Spine J，2016，25（8）：2535-2545.
[9]	段小锋，郑汉江，陈俊君，等.椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症并发症的临床分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志，2016，9（9）：703-706.
[10]	叶猛，王力文，王鸿晨，等.椎间孔镜手术出现失误及并发症的原因与预防措施[J].局解手术学杂志，2017，26（5）：362-366.
[11]	袁宏伟.椎间孔镜治疗椎间隙感染[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2017，25（19）：1820-1822.
[12]	吴军，谢水华，唐清美，等.椎间孔镜微创手术治疗腰椎间盘突出感染患者的疗效分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2016，26（19）：4494-4496.
[13]	何丁文，姚玉龙，邓中博，等.经皮椎间孔镜技术翻修腰椎融合术后椎间隙感染[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2017，25（11）：1042-1044.
[14]	聂治军，张文芳，张银刚，等.经皮椎间孔镜下TESSYS 技术治疗腰椎间盘突出的近期疗效观察[J].临床骨科杂志，2018，21（2）：153-156.
[15]	徐仲阳，吕超亮，王倩，等.椎间孔镜盘内活检在胸腰椎感染疾病中的应用[J].重庆医学，2017，46（36）：5152-5155.
[16]	蔡志刚，郭氧，穆臣会.经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效评价[J].中国现代医生，2019，57（18）：76-79.