Abstract：ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical significance of induced embolization in the treatment of giant intracranial aneurysm(GIA).Methods20 patients undergoing interventional therapy in our hospital from January 2011 to July 2013 were enrolled in this study,which clinical data were obtained from 10 patients who underwent spring coil induced embolization and 10 cases were treated by occlusion of aneurysm.The results were followed up for 6-24 months,the results of immediate angiography and followed-up angiography were evaluated.ResultsAmong postoperative angiography,8 patients(80%)were completely occluded and 2 patients(20%)were most occluded in patients underwent spring coil induced embolization.Among postoperative angiography,6 cases(60%)were completely occluded,2 cases(20%)were most occluded and 2 cases(20%)were partially occluded in patients underwent occlusion of aneurysm.The followed-up angiography was performed that all patients were completely occluded among patients underwent spring coil induced embolization;7 patients with complete occlusion,1 with most occlusion and 2 with re-opening after stent-graft embolization treatment turned to complete occlusion among patients underwent occlusion of aneurysm.ConclusionThe results of angiography and followed-up angiography after spring coil induced embolization are better than those of occlusion of aneurysm.
京公网安备 11010502046607号