穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To study the curative effect of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in the treatment of perforated appendicitis.Methods 74 cases of perforated appendicitis from March 2016 to March 2017 in our hospital were selected as the research object,all patients were randomly divided into the laparoscopic group and the open surgery group,37 cases in each group.The laparoscopic group was given the implementation of laparoscopic surgery,and the open surgery group was treated with open surgery.The operation time,ambulation time,postoperative exhaust time,the score of 8 h postoperative pain,the incidence of complications,hospitalization time and treatment cost were compared in the two groups.Results The ambulation time,postoperative exhaust time,hospitalization time of the laparoscopic group was shorter than that of the open surgery group,the scores of 8 h postoperative pain,the incidence rate of complication in the laparoscopic group was lower than that in the open surgery group,with significant difference (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the operation time and treatment cost between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion The effect of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of perforated appendicitis is remarkable,with less trauma,less complications,rapid recovery,shorter hospitalization time,and is suitable for clinical application.

Key words： Perforated appendicitis Laparoscope Open surgery Curative effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SUN Qiang

Cite this article:

SUN Qiang. Curative effect comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of perforated appendicitis[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(27): 25-27.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2017/V24/I27/25

[1]	王共华，任文清.穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效对比分析[J].航空航天医学杂志，2015，26（9）：1106-1107.
[2]	胡明秋，宋希江，姜成文，等.急性穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效对比研究[J].中国现代医学杂志，2009，19（20）：3155-3157，3161.
[3]	江义舟.穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗的疗效比较观察[J].河南外科学杂志，2016，22（4）：75-76.
[4]	庞永奎.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性穿孔性阑尾炎的疗效对照分析[J].中华普通外科学文献（电子版），2015，9（6）：491-493.
[5]	赵春泉.穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效对比[J].当代医学，2016，22（8）：85-86.
[6]	胡伟来，何海荣，叶德夫，等.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术在急性穿孔性阑尾炎治疗中的疗效分析[J].中国医药导报，2011，8（13）：50-51.
[7]	徐梓清.穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效对比探析[J].临床研究，2016，24（2）：91.
[8]	王勇，彭永光，李奕瑾，等.开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的临床效果比较[J].临床军医杂志，2015，43（1）：10-13.
[9]	万里鹏，万鸿，吴安定，等.腹腔镜治疗伴有坏疽、穿孔及阑尾周围脓肿的复杂性阑尾炎的优势探讨[J].安徽医药，2015，26（5）：946-947.
[10]	侯崇智，冯雪.腹腔镜治疗小儿阑尾炎穿孔的临床效果分析[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2015，33（15）：1306-1309.
[11]	张弦，徐继宗，付广，等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志，2015，15（9）：798-800.
[12]	官敏，张平，鲁力.超重的穿孔或坏疽性阑尾炎患者行腹腔镜手术的近期疗效分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志，2015，22（11）：1354-1358.
[13]	张大明.复杂性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术疗效比较及感染预防[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2013，（14）：3411-3412，3415.
[14]	赵晓刚.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗急性复杂性阑尾炎临床疗效比较分析[J].中国初级卫生保健，2015，29（4）：133-134.
[15]	陈俊峰，张家兴，黄剑伟，等.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗老年急性化脓性阑尾炎并穿孔的疗效对比[J].牡丹江医学院学报，2016，37（3）：86-88.
[16]	殷强.腹腔镜微创手术在穿孔性阑尾炎患者中的应用效果[J].甘肃科技，2016，32（12）：120-121.