一次性根管与常规根管治疗急性牙髓炎的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (31 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effect of one-time root canal therapy and conventional root canal therapy for acute pulpitis.Methods The clinical data of 90 patients with acute pulpitis who were admitted to Wuyishan Municipal Hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.Patients were divided into the control group(n=45)and the observation group(n=45)according to the different treatment protocol.The control group received conventional root canal therapy,while the observation group implemented one-time root canal therapy to compare the clinical efficacy,pain improvement,prognostic effect and quality of life between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in the total treatment response rate between the two groups(P＞0.05).The visual analog scale(VAS)score of pain after treatment in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The total complication rate and recurrence rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,with statistically significant differences(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in quality of life(SF-36)scores between the two groups before treatment(P＞0.05).The scores of SF-36 in the two groups after treatment were higher than those before treatment,and the scores of SF-36 in the observation group was higher than those in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P＜0.05).Conclusion In the clinical treatment of acute pulpitis,both one-time root canal treatment and conventional root canal treatment have significant therapeutic effects,but one-time root canal treatment has a more active application in improving its prognosis and quality of life value.

Key words： Acute pulpitis One-time root canal treatment Clinical efficacy Quality of life

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	JIANG Ming-ying
	CHEN Xiao-cui
	DAI Lin-zhong

Cite this article:

JIANG Ming-ying,CHEN Xiao-cui,DAI Lin-zhong. Comparison of the effect of one-time root canal therapy and conventional root canal therapy on acute pulpitis[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(15): 152-154.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2021/V28/I15/152

[1]	李少雅.一次性与常规根管治疗术对急性牙髓炎的治疗价值对比[J].中国医疗器械信息，2018，24（19）：121，138.
[2]	严玲艳.一次性与常规根管治疗术治疗急性牙髓炎的效果比较[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2018，5（23）：103，107.
[3]	高学军，董艳梅.根管治疗技术指南[J].中华口腔医学杂志，2014，49（5）：272-274.
[4]	冯全胜，杨璐，徐文秀.一次性根管治疗与常规根管治疗急性牙髓炎的效果和安全性观察[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志，2020，8（16）：184，194.
[5]	马俊龙.一次性与常规根管治疗术治疗急性牙髓炎的效果比较[J].临床医药文献电子杂志，2018，5（88）：97-98.
[6]	李莉.一次性根管治疗与常规根管治疗急性牙髓炎的效果评价[J].中国现代药物应用，2019，13（22）：99-100.
[7]	韩瑞林.一次性与常规根管治疗术治疗急性牙髓炎的效果比较[J].中国药物与临床，2019，19（5）：827-828.
[8]	刘学勍.一次性与常规根管治疗术治疗急性牙髓炎的效果比较[J].中外医学研究，2018，16（28）：161-163.
[9]	刘萍萍.探讨对比分析采用一次性根管治疗与多次根管治疗牙体牙髓病的临床效果[J].中外医学研究，2020，18（32）：106-107.
[10]	孟宪锋.多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床疗效研究[J].中外医疗，2020，39（29）：46-48.
[11]	庞雪峰，路建英.一次法根管治疗牙体牙髓病患者的临床疗效[J].医疗装备，2020，33（2）：120-121.
[12]	李忠孝.不同根管疗法治疗牙体牙髓病临床疗效对比[J].数理医药学杂志，2019，32（2）：214-215.
[13]	夏雪飞.多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病的临床对照[J].中国继续医学教育，2018，10（35）：116-118.
[14]	李舒.多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床效果观察[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2018，5（35）：29-30.
[15]	卫星.一次性根管治疗与多次法根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床疗效比较[J].临床合理用药杂志，2018，11（34）：165-167.