|
|
Comparison of the application effect of physiological anchorage control technique and straight wire arch technique in the treatment of children with orthodontic correction |
CHEN XueSA Ri-na |
Department of Stomatology,Hulunbuir People′s Hospital,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,Hulunbuir 021008,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the application effect of physiological anchorage control technique and straight wire arch technique in children′s orthodontic correction.Methods From January 2016 to January 2020,66 children who underwent orthodontic correction from the Hulunbuir People′s Hospital were selected as the research subjects.They were divided into the control group(n=33,36 affected teeth)and the study group(n=33,37 affected teeth)using a random number table methods.The children in the control group were treated with traditional straight wire arch technique,and the children in the study group were treated with physiological anchorage technique.The X-ray measurement related parameters,bite force,masticatory efficiency and the incidence of complications of the two groups were compared.Results The angle between the mandibular central incisor and the mandibular plane(L1-MP),the vertical distance from the highest point of the mesial cheek tip of the mandibular first molar to the mandibular plane(L6-MP),anterior inferior height(ANS-Me),Y axis angle,the vertical distance from the highest point of the mesial cheek tip of the maxillary first molar to the palatal plane(U6-PP),the vertical distance of the incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor to the palatal plane(U1-PP)and the ratio of the antero-inferior height to the overall height(ANS-Me/N-Me)in the study group were significantly smaller than those in the control group,and the antero-superior height(N-ANS)in the study group was significantly larger than the control group,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The bite force and chewing efficiency of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group,with statistical differences(P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group,with statistically significance(P<0.05).Conclusion The use effect of physiological anchorage control technique in orthodontic correction of children is better than straight wire arch technique in the vertical control of maxillary incisors.It can improve the masticatory function of children and is worthy of popularization and application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李硕,胡炜.种植支抗对成人高角病例垂直向控制效果的对比研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2018,25(4):181-185.
|
[2] |
赖文莉.无托槽隐形矫治技术推磨牙向后的临床应用策略[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2019,46(4):373-382.
|
[3] |
黄一平,李巍然.种植支抗垂直向控制矫治安氏Ⅱ类高角露龈笑上颌前突下颌后缩病例[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2020,27(2):107-110.
|
[4] |
吴稀,韦代伦,周容,等.两种舌侧托槽垂直向控制性能三维有限元分析[J].安徽医科大学学报,2018,53(2):312-315.
|
[5] |
冯建坤,王宏宇,李杨,等.MBT技术结合微种植钉支抗治疗青少年骨性Ⅱ类高角错畸形的临床效果研究[J].口腔医学,2019,39(12):1108-1112.
|
[6] |
罗远,张延晓,柯正建.PASS技术矫治1例双颌前突伴开(牙合)病例[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2018,25(4):231-233.
|
[7] |
严季丰.PASS与MBT矫治技术对均角病例颅颌面垂直向结构的影响[D].芜湖:皖南医学院,2019.
|
[8] |
王珺,欧龙,张丽洁,等.自锁托槽矫治器在正畸治疗中对患者口腔状况及牙周组织炎症因子表达的影响[J].生物技术通讯,2019,30(6):801-804.
|
[9] |
孙谋远,黄清波,王孔槐,等.无托槽隐形矫治技术与传统固定矫治技术对正畸患者牙周健康的影响[J].口腔医学,2018,38(2):149-153.
|
[10] |
冯素亚,蔡留意,张月兰,等.个体化舌侧矫治内收上前牙时牙齿移动趋势的三维有限元分析及临床验证[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2020,55(3):381-385.
|
[11] |
顾泽旭.无托槽隐形矫治的支抗控制及临床策略[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2020,55(8):531-535.
|
[12] |
史雅绒,王培军,刘潇遥,等.颊侧多曲簧近中水平曲打开后双侧垂直向矫治力的实验研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2019,26(2):95-99.
|
[13] |
彭斌,罗耀鹏,梁培慧.自锁托槽矫正技术在正畸患者中的应用及对龈沟液内IL-1β、TNF-α水平的影响研究[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2018,26(5):50-53.
|
[14] |
陈翠,张士杰.早期功能矫治技术在儿童正畸中的临床疗效[J].中国医药导刊,2019,5(11):665-668.
|
[15] |
高瑜,王璇,李毕超,等.骨性Ⅲ类错牙合牙弓宽度与垂直向的相关性研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2019,26(3):131-135.
|
[16] |
林和平.Headgear-Twinblock矫治垂直生长型骨性Ⅱ类错患者一例[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2020,27(2):118-120.
|
[17] |
管丽敏,阿依古丽·吐尔地,周洪.PASS生理支抗技术矫治双牙弓前突错的临床研究[J].北京口腔医学,2018,26(2):90-94.
|
[18] |
邹崇飞,邓怡.不同骨面型双颌前突患者正畸拔牙治疗后唇部软组织变化的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2020,36(2):335-338.
|
|
|
|