克氏针内固定和微型钢板内固定治疗Bennett骨折的临床效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (30 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of Kirschner wire internal fixation and mini plate internal fixation in the treatment of Bennett fracture, and provide an important reference for clinical studies.Methods Clinical data of Bennett fracture patients admitted to Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Pulandian District Central Hospital of Dalian City from January 2019 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.A total of 69 patients who received Kirschner wire internal fixation were randomly selected, and 73 patients whose propensity score matched the micro plate internal fixation.The related indicators of surgery such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time and hospital stay, the excellent and good rate of surgery and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups.Results The length of hospital stay and fracture healing time of patients in the microplate internal fixation group were shorter than those in the Kirschner wire internal fixation group, the upper limb function assessment form (DASH) scores at 4 and 8 months after discharge were lower than those in the Kirschner wire internal fixation group, the excellent and good rates of surgery was higher than that in the Kirschner wire internal fixation group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).There were no significant differences in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion Mini plate internal fixation in the treatment of Bennett fractures has less hospitalization time than Kirschner wire internal fixation, faster fracture healing, and obvious short-term effects.The long-term effects need further clinical exploration.

Key words： Kirschner wire Mini plate Bennett fracture Clinical curative effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Jin

Cite this article:

ZHOU Jin. Clinical effect comparison of Kirschner wire internal fixation and mini plate internal fixation in the treatment of Bennett fracture[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(8): 74-76.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2021/V28/I8/74

[1]	Kjaer-Petersen K，Langhoff O，Andersen K.Bennett′s fracture[J].J Hand Surg Br，1990，15（1）：58-61.
[2]	李海雷，李大村，李建峰，等.直径2.0 mm 空心加压螺钉治疗Bennett骨折[J].中华手外科杂志，2016，32（6）：445-446.
[3]	陈春华，姚中凯，龚冲丞，等.微型钢板内固定治疗Bennett骨折疗效分析[J].中华手外科杂志，2016，32（6）：401-402.
[4]	姚中凯，杨晨松，陈春华，等.可吸收螺钉及微型钢板治疗Bennett骨折的疗效比较[J].中华手外科杂志，2016，32（4）：264-266.
[5]	陈振兵，洪光祥，王发斌.上肢功能评定表[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2004，18（6）：520-521.
[6]	王桂龙，李翠云，刘加田，等.微型外固定架结合有限切开内固定技术治疗掌指骨骨折的疗效和适应证的探讨[J].中华手外科杂志，2017，33（2）：151-152.
[7]	刘松，刘勃，杨光，等.2010年至2011年中国东部和西部地区第一掌骨基底骨折的流行病学对比分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2017，19（12）：1069-1073.
[8]	李俊，郑建平.闭合复位经皮克氏针固定和切开复位微型钢板内固定对Bennett骨折的近远期疗效[J].解放军医药杂志，2019，31（3）：106-109.
[9]	冯炜.闭合复位平行克氏针固定治疗第1掌骨基底部骨折[J].浙江临床医学，2017，19（2）：266-267.
[10]	徐润冰，何双华，胡新宇，等.微型锁定钛板背侧与侧方放置在近节指骨骨折中的临床疗效比较[J].中华手外科杂志，2018，34（1）：63-64.
[11]	高壮松.不同手术方案治疗Bennett骨折的近期疗效比较[J].山西医药杂志，2017，46（8）：953-956.
[12]	褚庭纲，朱旭伟，林康，等.闭合与经皮撬拨复位固定治疗近节指骨基底骨折的对比研究[J].中华手外科杂志，2018，34（1）：36-39.
[13]	沈华，沈尊理，马杰，等.空心拉力螺钉治疗Bennett骨折的临床研究[J].中华手外科杂志，2014，30（5）：365-367.
[14]	姚铿，梁俊锋，谭宇顺.掌指骨骨折内固定治疗法的临床效果分析[J].中国医药科学，2019，9（12）：218-221.
[15]	冯小兵，吴天昊，颜泉，等.切开复位内固定联合韧带重建治疗陈旧性Bennett骨折[J].中华手外科杂志，2020，36（4）：267-270.