单通道微创经皮肾镜与电子输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石的效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (426 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To observe the effect of single-channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureter soft mirror in the treatment of complex renal calculi.Methods 117 patients with complicated renal calculi treated in our hospital from March 2012 to November 2016 were selected as the subjects,and the patients were divided into control group (64 cases) and study group (53 cases).The control group was treated with single-channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy,and the study group was treated with ureteral softening.The operation time,hemoglobin loss,hospitalization time,disposable stone clearance rate,Ⅱ reoperation rate and complications occurred of the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (P>0.05).The hemoglobin loss of the study group was lower than that of the control group,the hospitalization time was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05),disposable stone clearance rate in the study group (37.74%) was lower than that in the control group (70.31%) (P<0.05).The complication rate of the study group was 9.43%,which was lower than that of the control group (25.00%) (P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of electron ureteral soft mirror in the treatment of complex renal calculi is more remarkable than that of single channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithy,which is worthy of further application in clinical practice.

Key words： Single-channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithoscope Electronic ureter soft mirror Complex renal calculi

Received: 15 June 2017

PACS:

R699.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WAN Bin
	ZHANG Wen-sheng
	YANG Shao-hong

Cite this article:

WAN Bin,ZHANG Wen-sheng,YANG Shao-hong. The effect of single-channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and electronic ureteral soft mirror in the treatment of complex renal calculi[J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(25): 69-71.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2017/V24/I25/69

[1]	徐刚,虞力航,周毅.单通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22（5）：107-109.
[2]	郭峰,高兴华,张龙洋.单通道微创经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石疗效观察[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2015,20（7）：472-474.
[3]	王瑾,李海潮,李荣军,等.关于复杂性肾结石患者联合采用单通道微创经皮肾输尿管硬镜与软镜治疗的效果分析[J].临床医药文献杂志（电子版）,2016,3（53）：10 495-10 496.
[4]	郑健忠,梁福律,范先明,等.多通道经皮肾镜与单通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石的效果比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2016,21（8）：593-596.
[5]	刘勇,王涛,果佳.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术与单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合及单独使用治疗复杂性肾结石的疗效评价及其安全性分析[J].中国医学装备,2016,13（11）：80-84.
[6]	Neeraj KG,Apul G,Satya NS, et al .A critical appraisal of complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in paediatric patients using adult instruments[J].BJU Int,2014,113（5）：801-810.
[7]	徐桂彬.微创经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石临床系列研[D].广州：南方医科大学.2013.
[8]	李柏均,董珍艳,李陆安,等.同期单通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗复杂性肾结石35例[J].山东医药,2013,53（40）：95-96.
[9]	王小磊,武进峰.单通道经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜在复杂性肾结石治疗中的应用[J].中国现代医药杂志,2016,18（7）：103-105.
[10]	陈立红,章永坚,沈晗.微创经皮肾镜取石术联合Ⅱ期逆行输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石96例[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2016,36（3）：321-323.
[11]	谢炜,罗金泰.微创经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石的临床研究[J].中国当代医药,2017,24（4）：92-94.
[12]	潘卫兵,张遂兵,谢礼仁.微创经皮肾镜联合电子输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的效果观察[J].中国当代医药,2016,23（31）：47-50.
[13]	黄亮,李朝坤,韩小兵,等.单通道微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石的临床研究[J].微创医学,2016,11（5）：749-750.
[14]	王先峰.微创经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石的临床效果分析[J].中国医药指南,2016,14（29）：35-36.
[15]	吴辉.多通道微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石的效果观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2017,23（2）：127-128.