|
|
Application effect comparison of family members involved in nursing intervention and routine nursing in patients with multiple metatarsal fractures |
ZHENG Yi-hong LIANG Yi-rong HUANG Su-ming LIN Cai-zhen |
Department of Hand and Foot Surgery,Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Guangdong Province,Foshan 528200,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical value of family members involved in nursing intervention and routine nursing in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with multiple metatarsal fractures.Methods Sixty patients with multiple metatarsal fractures from January 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled as subjects in the department of outpatient in our hospital.The patients were divided into observation group and control group by the random number table method,with 30 cases in each group.In the control group,routine nursing was used,while in the observation group,the family members involved in the nursing intervention was adopted.The outpatient treatment,rehabilitation and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the outpatient cost of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the SAS scores of the two group were lower than those before treatment,and the SAS scores of the observation group were lower than the control group with statistical significance (P<0.05).Half-year follow-up showed that the external fixation dismantling time and fracture healing time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group.The excellent and good rate of foot functional recovery was superior to that of the control group with a significant difference(P<0.05).The total nursing satisfaction of the observation group(93.33%)was higher than that of the control group(73.33%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Family members of patients with multiple metatarsal fractures involved in nursing intervention can effectively improve the treatment of patients,facilitate the improvement of rehabilitation and nursing satisfaction,and has good economic benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
高燕.护理干预对骨折患者手术的影响[J].中国煤炭工业医学,2013,16(11):1906-1908.
|
[2] |
胡善萍.护理干预对骨折患者术后疼痛及满意度的影响[J].吉林医学,2015,36(14):3162-3163.
|
[3] |
孙群,王彩红.骨折护理在临床中的应用[J].北方药学,2014,21(9):80-81.
|
[4] |
王亚红,相亚娟.综合护理在足部骨折患者治疗过程中的应用效果分析[J].微量元素与健康研究,2015,33(4):2-3.
|
[5] |
王晶.56例足部骨折患者进行综合护理的效果观察分析[J].双足与保健,2017,26(3):50-51.
|
[6] |
李璀.延伸护理对青壮年股骨颈骨折预后的影响[J].河南外科学,2018,24(3):173-174.
|
[7] |
李宁.临床护理工作缺陷分析及干预措施[J].护理实践与研究,2012,9(4):114-116.
|
[8] |
黄艳.家属参与护理干预在多发性跖骨骨折患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理,2016,22(22):79-81.
|
[9] |
赵艳梅.家庭参与院外延续性护理在多发跖骨骨折中的应用[J].社区医学,2017,15(20):3-5.
|
[10] |
颜丽,叶明.持续性护理干预对骨折术后肢体功能恢复的效果分析[J].现代中西医结合,2015,24(12):1358-1360.
|
[11] |
曾湘云,卢丹,郑勇前,等.社区延续性护理对创伤性四肢骨折患者生活质量的影响[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(12):148-149.
|
[12] |
冯学英.心理护理干预对创伤性骨折患者负情绪的影响[J].中国伤残医学,2012,20(10):104-105.
|
[13] |
宮颖.心理护理干预对骨折后抑郁焦虑患者心理状态和生活质量的影响效果研究[J].黑龙江医药,2017,30(4):918-920.
|
[14] |
裴东颜.心理干预对四肢骨折内固定术患者焦虑的影响[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(32):152.
|
[15] |
张海云,祁晓蓉,李晓英,等.舒适护理干预对骨折术后患者焦虑情绪、疼痛以及护理满意度的影响[J].国际精神病学,2016,11(4):729-731.
|
|
|
|