微创拔牙技术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (18)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (36 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare and observe the effect and safety of minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction in the extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth,so as to provide reference for the selection of surgical treatment Methods in the future.Methods A total of 5000 patients with unilateral impacted mandibular wisdom teeth in the Department of Stomatology of our hospital and the First People′s Hospital of Huizhou City from January 2016 to April 2019 were selected as observation samples.They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group,with 2500 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional tooth extraction (chisel and crown splitting),and the observation group was treated with high-speed turbines and long splitting,minimally invasive tooth extraction combined with drill and minimally invasive tooth extraction knife.The operation time of the two groups was compred,and visual analogue scale score was used to evaluate the degree of pain after operation in the two groups.The complications of the two groups were recorded the occurrence of perioperative complications.Results The operation time of the observation group was(17.75±3.53)min,which was significantly shorter than (33.16±6.24)min of the control group,with statistical significance (P＜0.05).The pain degree of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group,with statistical significance (P＜0.05).The total incidence of perioperative complications in the observation group was 19.16%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(50.32%),with statistical significance(P＜0.05).Conclusion Minimally invasive extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth has shorter operation time,with less pain,lower incidence of perioperative complications and high safety.It can be used as the preferred method in clinical promotion and application.

Key words： Mandible Impacted wisdom teeth Minimally invasive Complications

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHEN Dong
	HUANG Rong
	NIE Zi-lin

Cite this article:

ZHEN Dong,HUANG Rong,NIE Zi-lin. Application effect of minimally invasive extraction technique in extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(17): 115-117转136.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I17/115

[1]	武东辉，李劲松，朱韵莹，等.微创拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床经验总结[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志（电子版）：2013，12（6）：494-497.
[2]	Renton T，Hankins M，Sproate C，et al.A randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2005，43（1）：7-12.
[3]	王凌霄，李钧，单兆臣，等.两种翻瓣方式在下颌中低位阻生智齿拔除中的疗效研究[J].口腔医学，2018，38（6）：551-553.
[4]	李树朝.涡轮手机与传统凿骨劈冠法应用于下颌阻生智齿拔除的临床探讨[J].北京口腔医学，2018，26（2）：49-51.
[5]	Dodson TB，Richardson DT.Risk of periodonal defect safter third molar sugery：an exercisein evidence-based clinical decision-making[J].Oral Maxillofac Surg Clinical North Am，2007，19（1）：93-98.
[6]	张兆高，罗军，蔡丽娜，等.近下颌管下颌阻生智齿微创法与锤凿法拔牙效果对比[J].中国妇幼健康研究，2017，28（S4）：480-481.
[7]	付升旗，范锡印，苗莹莹，等.下颌管的三维重建及临床意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志，2011，29（4）：375-381.
[8]	黎钢，雷荣昌，郭宏剑，等.微创拔牙法在下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术中的临床应用[J].临床口腔医学杂志，2011，27（4）：415-417.
[9]	Foreuzanfar T，Sabelis A，Ausems S，et al.Effect of ice compression oil pain after mandibular third molar surgery：a single-blind，randomized controlled trial[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg，2008；37（9）：824-830.
[10]	刘长春，张丹.微创拔牙法拔除下颌近中阻生牙生理微创的观察[J].实用医院临床杂志，2014，9（5）：161-164.
[11]	李向军，张晓燕，张晓，等.2种微动力系统应用于下颌低位阻生智齿拔除术的比较研究[J].口腔医学研究，2017，33（5）：93-97.
[12]	李学诗.微创拔牙术与传统拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用效果对比观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报，2014，35（12）：1795-1796.
[13]	刘改英，刘晓波，张伟.高速涡轮机、微创拔牙刀在阻生智齿拔除术中的应用观察[J].山西大同大学学报（自然科学版），2015，31（1）：33-35.
[14]	林勇，常显亭，张建成，等.微创拔牙技术拔除下颌低位埋伏阻生智齿临床研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志，2014，7（5）：274-278.
[15]	郭红燕.微创拔牙器械和传统拔牙器械在下颌阻生齿拔除术中的临床应用比较[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2016，3（10）：5-6.
[16]	张霞.锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效果及安全性对比[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2017，4（10）：7-10.
[17]	严伟一，许翔.锤凿劈冠法与微创拔牙治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的临床效果及安全性对比[J].浙江创伤外科，2017，22（1）：35-37.
[18]	梁清军.两种方法拔除下颌阻生智齿的效果比较[J].口腔颌面外科杂志，2015，25（3）：195-198.