|
|
Effect comparison of laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids |
XIA Shao-feng |
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Macheng Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Hubei Province,Macheng 438300,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To compare the effect of laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids.Methods A total of 92 patients with uterine fibroids who admitted to our hospital from December 2016 to July 2018 were selected and divided into the control group and the study group according to random number table method,46 cases in each group.The control group was given laparoscopic myomectomy,the study group underwent laparoscopic myomectomy.After surgery,the clinical surgery-related indicators,postoperative conditions,adverse reactions and immune system indicators were compared between the two groups.Results After surgery,in terms of the clinical surgery-related indicators,the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the study group was lower than that in the control group.The anal exhaust time and length of hospital stay were shorter than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In terms of the surgery time,the study group was longer than in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);in terms of the postoperative conditions,the postoperative prevalence rate,postoperative analgesia application rate,and postoperative residual incidence rate in the study group were lower than in the control group and the differences were statistically significant.In terms of the postoperative recurrence,the incidence rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In terms of the adverse reactions,the total incidence rate in the study group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);in terms of the immune system index,the IgG and IgA levels in the study group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).In terms of IgM,the difference between the two groups was not significant,and there was no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional open myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids,laparoscopic myomectomy has a significant effect,less adverse reactions,better postoperative conditions,and a higher clinical value,which is worthy of promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
佟卫兵.腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术疗效的评价[J].中外医疗,2016,35(12):106-107.
|
[2] |
郭玉琳.腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(7):824-826.
|
[3] |
韩桂玲.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效比较[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(21):117-118.
|
[4] |
谢秀玲.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效比较[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(19):2432-2433.
|
[5] |
曹亮.腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹手术的临床疗效对比[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(3):66-66.
|
[6] |
赵晓棠.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效比较[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(21):2957-2958.
|
[7] |
冯丽丽.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效对比研究[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(26):145-146.
|
[8] |
李娜.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤效果比较[J].中国急救医学,2016,36(1):54-55.
|
[9] |
田艺,张坤,苏青,等.腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤微创剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效及对患者应激反应的影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2018,47(1):93-95.
|
[10] |
李斯静,李晓菲,张娟,等.腹腔镜超声辅助子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床应用[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(33):2652.
|
[11] |
王小云.舒适护理在腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中的效果分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(16):215-217.
|
[12] |
肖淑,尤共平,欧海蔚,等.腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术患者围术期相关变化的研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2016,27(3):370-372.
|
[13] |
张碧黎,章素琴,王依静.不同子宫肌瘤剔除术对患者局部微循环及炎性指标的影响研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(16):3402-3404.
|
[14] |
罗萍.子宫肌瘤不同术式剔除术后临床疗效及其对妊娠的影响[J].中国医师杂志,2016,18(5):776-778.
|
[15] |
胡婷,王宇翮,石钢.腹腔镜下多发子宫肌瘤剔除术临床疗效分析[J].实用医院临床杂志,2017,14(3):71-73.
|
[16] |
薛宏.腹腔镜下与经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床对比研究[J].皖南医学院学报,2016,35(5):481-484.
|
|
|
|