二微米激光前列腺汽化剜除术与经尿道双极等离子前列腺切除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (11)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effect of two-micron laser prostate vaporization enucleation and transurethral bipolar plasma prostatectomy in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods A total of 110 patients with large benign prostatic hyperplasia who were treated in our hospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were selected as the subjects.They were divided into control group (transurethral bipolar plasma prostatectomy)and observation group(two-micron laser prostate vaporization enucleation)by the random number table method,with 55 cases in each group.The clinical indicators of the two groups were compared.Results After treatment,the postoperative hospital stay,indwelling catheter time and bladder irrigation time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,with statistical significances(P<0.05).The hemoglobin level 1 h after surgery in the observation group was higher than that of the control group,with a statistical difference (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the operation time,prostate volume,residual urine volume,maximum urinary flow rate and international prostate symptom scores in the observation group compared with those of the control group (P>0.05).Conclusion The two-micron laser prostate vaporization enucleation can effectively improve the prognosis of patients with large benign prostatic hyperplasia.It is tantamount to transurethral bipolar plasma prostatectomy and is worthy of promotion.

Key words： Benign prostatic hyperplasia Prostate vaporization enucleation Large volume Two-micron laser

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	MA En-hui
	XU Tao
	GUO Zhen-jia
	GU Yu-feng
	WU Kai-da
	LIANG Zhong-cheng

Cite this article:

MA En-hui,XU Tao,GUO Zhen-jia, et al. Effect comparison of two-micron laser prostate vaporization enucleation and transurethral bipolar plasma prostatectomy in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(16): 101-103.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I16/101

[1]	罗照，林川，牛超，等.系统评价绿激光汽化术与双极等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床效果[J].中国临床研究，2018，31（2）：201-206.
[2]	刘东波，殷德科，古孝良.小蓟饮子加减方治疗良性前列腺增生症经尿道双极等离子汽化电切术后出血临床观察[J].陕西中医，2017，38（11）：1540-1541.
[3]	何宗海，官润云，杨旷平，等.经尿道前列腺等离子电切术与2 μm铥激光汽化切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的并发症对比[J].广东医学，2017，38（14）：2202-2205.
[4]	袁宝国，殷全忠.经尿道前列腺等离子切除术与钬激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生对比研究[J].实用老年医学，2017，31（4）：456-458.
[5]	徐建，胡云飞，王潇.1470 nm激光汽化术与等离子双极电切术用于治疗良性前列腺增生的临床对比研究[J].医学研究杂志，2017，46（4）：123-127.
[6]	江敦勤.经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症效果观察[J].山东医药，2016，56（46）：97-99.
[7]	盛明雄，万玲玲，刘昌明.经尿道选择性绿激光汽化术与经尿道等离子电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生的比较[J].实用医学杂志，2016，32（23）：3890-3893.
[8]	杨中华，刘同族，王行环.经尿道前列腺铥激光汽化术与等离子切除术治疗前列腺增生疗效的5年随访比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志，2016，21（10）：764-767.
[9]	张鹏，赵建忠，王永恒，等.2 μm激光与电切治疗良性前列腺增生的效果比较[J].实用临床医药杂志，2016，20（17）：122-123，130.
[10]	蔡振，周华设.经尿道双极电切术与等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的效果比较[J].医学综述，2016，22（13）：2693-2696.
[11]	杨清荣，王婷，彭胤琼，等.高龄高危良性前列腺增生患者应用经尿道2 μm激光前列腺汽化术疗效分析[J].陕西医学杂志，2016，45（6）：692-694.
[12]	王世先，杨水法，杨恩明，等.不同前列腺体积采用经尿道双极等离子电切术与剜除术治疗的前瞻性对比研究（附 521 例报告）[J].微创泌尿外科杂志，2016，5（3）：145-149.
[13]	范志强，刘中华，朱晓博，等.经尿道前列腺双极等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志，2016，5（3）：158-162.
[14]	邓爱华.传统开放手术与微创TUERP手术治疗大体积老年良性前列腺增生比较研究[J].河北医药，2016，38（8）：1195-1197.
[15]	刘迪，付宜鸣，倪少滨.经尿道2 μm激光剜除术与等离子电切术治疗大体积前列腺增生临床分析[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志，2016，30（3）：257-259.