|
|
|
| Value of microcolumn gel immunoassay technology in the identification of clinical blood types and ensuring the safety of blood transfusion |
| ZONG Qing-lan1 ZHU Xiao-yan2 AO Si-zhen2 YE Jin-hua2 |
1.Fengcheng People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Fengcheng 331100, China;
2.Zhangshu People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Zhangshu 331200, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the value of microcolumn gel immunoassay for identifying clinical blood type and ensuring blood transfusion safety. Methods A total of 100 patients who underwent transfusion therapy from February 2017 to February 2019 in Fengcheng People′s Hospital and Zhangshu People′s Hospital were enrolled in the study.According to the random number table method, they were divided into the saline test tube method group (50 cases) and the microcolumn gel immunoassay group ( 50 cases).The saline test tube method was detected by saline test tube method group, and the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was detected by microcolumn gel immunoassay group.The positive and negative stereotypes, positive and negative stereotypes, cross-matching success rate, cross-matching failure rate, false positive rate, detection sensitivity, specificity, transfusion accident rate and blood transfusion service quality score data indicators were compared between the two detection methods. Results There were no significant differences in the positive and negative conformity rates and positive and negative stereotypes of the two detection methods (P＞0.05).The cross-matching success rate of microcolumn gel immunoassay of the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was higher than that of the saline test tube method, there was statistically significant difference (P＜0.05).The crossmatching failure rate of the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was lower than that of the saline test tube method,the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the detection sensitivity and specificity of the examination method between the microcolumn gel immunoassay method and saline test tube method(P＞0.05).The blood transfusion service quality score of the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was higher than that of the saline test tube method, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The incidence of transfusion accidents in the microcolumn gel immunoassay method was lower than that in the saline test tube method, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Microcolumn gel immunoassay identification method can effectively reduce the incidence of transfusion accidents and improve the quality of blood transfusion services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
卢伟伟，王晓宁，王震，等.微柱凝胶免疫分析技术检测新生儿免疫性血小板减少症自身抗体的效果[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（4）：852-855.
|
| [2] |
吴昌松，王启春.6 种不同实验名称微柱凝胶试剂卡临床应用浅析[J].河南医学高等专科学校学报，2017，29（1）：66-68.
|
| [3] |
贺锋，程金凤，蔡细英.MNS 意外抗体检测及对血型鉴定和交叉配血影响的研究[J].临床血液学杂志（输血与检验），2018，31（10）：746-749.
|
| [4] |
刘建华.ABO、RH（D）血型鉴定中卡式微柱凝胶技术的应用[J].中国卫生标准管理，2017，8（23）：122-124.
|
| [5] |
周芳，赵文敬.卡式微柱凝胶试验在临床输血检验中的效果研究[J].中外医疗，2017，36（22）：81-83.
|
| [6] |
姬元忠，张玉春，邢银花.凝聚胺技术与微柱凝胶技术在ABO 新生儿溶血病患儿输血前检验中的应用价值对比分析[J].内科，2017，12（1）：108-110.
|
| [7] |
张川.微柱凝胶法检测血型及配血出现双群结果原因分析[J].检验医学与临床，2018，15（24）：3760-3761.
|
| [8] |
覃日吉，范微，谭玉清，等.试管法、微柱凝胶法及血型检测卡鉴定新生儿血型的效果比较[J].海南医学，2018，29（4）：563-564.
|
| [9] |
毕汇文，郑俊青，李坚，等.产前及输血前检测孕产妇ABO与RhD 血型的临床价值观察[J].国际医药卫生导报，2018，24（21）：3277-3279.
|
| [10] |
姚超峰，李会广.不规则抗体检测及IgG 抗-A（B）血型抗体效价在多次妊娠史孕妇产前检查中的临床价值[J].陕西医学杂志，2018，47（11）：1507-1509.
|
| [11] |
王璀里，冯时，王宇成，等.流式细胞术与传统试管法检测血型抗体滴度在ABO 血型不相容肾移植中的临床应用[J].中华器官移植杂志，2018，39（7）：402-406.
|
| [12] |
金勇，刘桂芳，余小平.白血病患者标本应用微柱凝胶法检测血型影响因素的探讨[J].临床血液学杂志（输血与检验），2018，31（2）：283-285.
|
| [13] |
马印图，王更银，李玉秋，等.微柱凝胶技术检测血型抗体IgG 亚型试验方法的建立[J].临床血液学杂志（输血与检验），2018，31（2）：253-256.
|
| [14] |
潘艳伟.微柱凝胶免疫检测技术鉴定临床血型及保证输血安全的意义[J].河南医学研究，2018，27（14）：2565-2566.
|
| [15] |
常娟玲.临床输血检验中卡式微柱凝胶试验的应用探讨[J].临床医学研究与实践，2017，2（26）：86-87.
|
|
|
|
